Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning

This paper investigates the relationship between learning and adaptation in supply chains located within industrial districts, with the aim of identifying the best adaptive supply chain. It is motivated by the increasing attention that the design of adaptive supply chains has been receiving in recent years, as it is considered one of the most important critical factors in gaining sustainable competitive advantage in the current hypercompetitive environment. Focusing on two learning processes (i.e., by imitation and by interacting), diverse types of adaptive supply chains recognizable within industrial districts are compared by means of an agent-based simulation on the basis of their adaptive performance in environments characterized by different level of complexity and turbulence. The results confirm that the supply chain type influences the relationship between learning and adaptation and that both the product complexity and the turbulence of the environment moderate this effect. Finally, the best adaptive supply chain in each type of context is identified.

[1]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[2]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Supply chains within industrial districts: A theoretical framework , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[4]  Vikas A. Aggarwal,et al.  Governing collaborative activity: interdependence and the impact of coordination and exploration , 2011 .

[5]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[6]  A. Scott.  A new map of Hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures , 2002 .

[7]  H.L. Lee,et al.  Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[9]  P.A.J. Berends,et al.  Simulation as a research tool in management studies , 1999 .

[10]  B. Kogut,et al.  Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network , 1994 .

[11]  S. Kauffman.  At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[12]  Rui Baptista,et al.  Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters , 2000 .

[13]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[14]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Gabi Dei Ottati,et al.  Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model , 1994 .

[16]  Robert Axelrod.  Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997 .

[17]  Virgilio Cruz-Machado,et al.  A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management , 2012 .

[18]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[19]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[22]  Amit Surana,et al.  Supply-chain networks: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2005 .

[23]  E. Mitleton-Kelly,et al.  Organizational learning and complexity science: exploring the joint potential , 2011 .

[24]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[25]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[26]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[27]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Evolution, Emergence, and Learning in Complex Systems , 2003 .

[29]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[30]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[31]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Computational Organizational Theory , 2015 .

[32]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  The Value and Costs of Modularity: A Problem‐Solving Perspective , 2007 .

[33]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[34]  K. Ridgway,et al.  Knowledge Transformation, Learning and Changes Giving Competitive Advantage in Aerospace Supply Chains , 2009 .

[35]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[36]  M. Cooper,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PURCHASING AND LOGISTICS STRATEGY. , 1993 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Supply chain relationships: Exploring the linkage between inter-organisational adaptation and learning , 2010 .

[39]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[40]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[41]  John H. Holland,et al.  Emergence. , 1997, Philosophica.

[42]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance , 2009 .

[43]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A COMPLEX SYSTEMS APPROACH TO LEARNING IN ADAPTIVE NETWORKS , 2001 .

[44]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[45]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Examining the relationship between degree of innovation and new product success , 1994 .

[46]  J. Sutherland.  The Quark and the Jaguar , 1994 .

[47]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change , 1997 .

[49]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[50]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[51]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[52]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[53]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[54]  M. Fisher.  What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[55]  M. Swink,et al.  Product Portfolio Architectural Complexity and Operational Performance: Incorporating the Roles of Learning and Fixed Assets , 2011 .

[56]  Ilaria Giannoccaro,et al.  Assessing the influence of the organization in the supply chain management using NK simulation , 2011 .

[57]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[58]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[59]  Michael J. Enright,et al.  Regional clusters and firm strategy , 1999 .

[60]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent Systems , 1999 .

[61]  Ralf W. Seifert,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Managing business dynamics with adaptive supply chain portfolios , 2011 .

[62]  Timothy W. Ruefli,et al.  Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Structure and Governance in Industrial Districts: Implications for Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[64]  Ilaria Giannoccaro,et al.  Innovation in industrial districts: An agent-based simulation model , 2006 .

[65]  Tim Sullivan,et al.  How games could save the world. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[66]  Anand Nair,et al.  Complexity and Adaptivity in Supply Networks: Building Supply Network Theory Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[67]  Glenn Hoetker,et al.  NK modeling methodology in the strategy literature: Bounded search on a rugged landscape , 2009 .

[68]  Joan C. Woodward.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[69]  Hau L. Lee.  The triple-A supply chain. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[70]  I. Giannoccaro,et al.  Making Geographical Clusters More Successful: Complexity-Based Policies , 2010 .

[71]  M. Christopher,et al.  Building the Resilient Supply Chain , 2004 .

[72]  E. Mitleton-Kelly.  Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures , 2003 .

[73]  Martin Reeves,et al.  Adaptability: The New Competitive Advantage , 2015 .

[74]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[75]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[76]  S. Vickery,et al.  Supply Chain Flexibility: An Empirical Study , 1999 .

[77]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[78]  Kerstin Press.  Divide to conquer? Limits to the adaptability of disintegrated, flexible specialization clusters , 2007 .