The response properties of auditory neurones in the midbrain of the domestic fowl (Callus gallus) to monaural and binaural stimuli

SummaryExtracellular recordings were made from auditory units in the midbrain (NMLD) of the domestic fowl. Tonal stimuli delivered monaurally to either ear revealed that contralateral excitation predominated and was coupled with ipsilateral inhibition (EI, 46%), excitation (EE, 21%) or no effect (EO, 17%). Conventional V-shaped tuning curves were readily obtained from contralateral excitatory thresholds, however complex effects were noted such as, inhibitory sidebands and double sensitivity peaks. The distribution of best frequency (BF) thresholds ranged from 60 Hz-5.0 kHz, with the most sensitive region between 1.0–2.0 kHz. Analysis of cell types with BF revealed wide distributions for EI and EE cells, however EO cells had a distinct bias for BF's above 1.0 kHz. Binaural stimuli were used to study unit sensitivity to experimentally produced differences in interaural intensity and time (phase). EI cells generally showed good sensitivity for interaural intensity differences up to 20 dB, across a wide range of BF's. EE cells which demonstrated interaural time sensitivity did so over several milliseconds (maximum physical delay 100 μs). These effects appeared to be related to the period of the stimulus (below 800 Hz) and reflected a tendency for unit responses to be phase-locked. Considering the limits of head size and high frequency sensitivity in the domestic fowl, the present neural data suggests that binaural intensity differences may be the only viable cue during sound localization.

[1]  M. Konishi,et al.  Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Schwartzkopff,et al.  Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsweise des Mittelohres und das Richtungshören der Singvögel unter Verwendung von Cochlea-Potentialen , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[3]  H. Latimer.  The postnatal growth of the central nervous system of the chicken , 1925 .

[4]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Some neural mechanisms in the inferior colliculus of the cat which may be relevant to localization of a sound source. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  E. Rubel,et al.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Tonotopic organization of N. magnocellularis and N. laminaris , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  R. L. Boord,et al.  THE ANATOMY OF THE AVIAN AUDITORY SYSTEM , 1969 .

[7]  R. L. Boord,et al.  Ascending projections of the primary cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris in the pigeon , 1968, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex , 1972 .

[9]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[10]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[11]  M. Biederman-Thorson.  Auditory responses of neurones in the lateral mesencephalic nucleus (inferior colliculus) of the Barbary dove , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Catherine A. Smith,et al.  Structure of the Avian Tectorial Membrane , 1975, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[14]  M. Sachs,et al.  Auditory sensitivity of the redwing Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) and brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater).. , 1977 .

[15]  J. Schwartzkopff,et al.  Beitrag zum Problem des Richtungshörens bei Vögeln , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[16]  M. Konishi.  Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds , 1970, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[17]  J. E. Hind,et al.  Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Timing of the discharges and observations on binaural stimulation. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Konishi.  Hearing, Single-Unit Analysis, and Vocalizations in Songbirds , 1969, Science.

[19]  G. Dohlman.  Electron-microscopic examination of the inner ear of the pigeon. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[20]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Locatable and Nonlocatable Acoustic Signals for Barn Owls , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[21]  E. Rubel,et al.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Organization of projections from N. magnocellularis to N. laminaris , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  E D Young,et al.  Discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon auditory nerve. , 1974, Brain research.

[23]  H. Karten,et al.  The organization of the ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia). I. Diencephalic projections of the inferior colliculus (nucleus mesencephali lateralis, pars dorsalis). , 1967, Brain research.

[24]  L. Aitkin,et al.  Responses of neurones in the rabbit inferior colliculus. II. Influence of binaural tonal stimulation. , 1972, Brain Research.

[25]  G. Gates,et al.  Cochlear microphonics in the adult domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). , 1975, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[26]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[27]  M. Konishi.  Development of auditory neuronal responses in avian embryos. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  W. R. Webster,et al.  Discharge patterns of single units in inferior colliculus of the alert cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Hans -Joachim Leppelsack.  Funktionelle Eigenschaften der Hörbahn im Feld L des Neostriatum caudale des Staren (Sturnus vulgaris L., Aves) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  P. Sharp.  A comparison of variations in plasma luteinizing hormone concentrations in male and female domestic chickens (Gallus domesticus) from hatch to sexual maturity. , 1975, The Journal of endocrinology.

[31]  S. Erulkar.  Comparative aspects of spatial localization of sound. , 1972, Physiological reviews.

[32]  W. R. Webster,et al.  Inferior colliculus. I. Comparison of response properties of neurons in central, pericentral, and external nuclei of adult cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  E I Knudsen,et al.  A neural map of auditory space in the owl. , 1978, Science.

[34]  T. Hotta.  Unit responses from the nucleus angularis in the pigeon's medulla. , 1971, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[35]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Functional organization of the dog superior olivary complex: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  J. Schwartzkopff.  Chapter 7 – MECHANORECEPTION , 1973 .

[37]  H. Scheich,et al.  Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[38]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Receptive fields of auditory neurons in the owl. , 1977, Science.