Inhibitor Selectivity for Cyclin‐Dependent Kinase 7: A Structural, Thermodynamic, and Modelling Study

Deregulation of the cell cycle by mechanisms that lead to elevated activities of cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDK) is a feature of many human diseases, cancer in particular. We identified small‐molecule inhibitors that selectively inhibit CDK7, the kinase that phosphorylates cell‐cycle CDKs to promote their activities. To investigate the selectivity of these inhibitors we used a combination of structural, biophysical, and modelling approaches. We determined the crystal structures of the CDK7‐selective compounds ICEC0942 and ICEC0943 bound to CDK2, and used these to build models of inhibitor binding to CDK7. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of inhibitors bound to CDK2 and CDK7 generated possible models of inhibitor binding. To experimentally validate these models, we gathered isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) binding data for recombinant wild‐type and binding site mutants of CDK7 and CDK2. We identified specific residues of CDK7, notably Asp155, that are involved in determining inhibitor selectivity. Our MD simulations also show that the flexibility of the G‐rich and activation loops of CDK7 is likely an important determinant of inhibitor specificity similar to CDK2.

[1]  Jun Cao,et al.  Selective CDK7 inhibition with BS-181 suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in gastric cancer , 2016, Drug design, development and therapy.

[2]  M. Dickler,et al.  The Role of CDK4/6 Inhibition in Breast Cancer. , 2015, The oncologist.

[3]  Tahir Ali Chohan,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase-2 as a target for cancer therapy: progress in the development of CDK2 inhibitors as anti-cancer agents. , 2014, Current medicinal chemistry.

[4]  M. Malumbres Cyclin-dependent kinases , 2014, Genome Biology.

[5]  Sridhar Ramaswamy,et al.  Targeting transcription regulation in cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor , 2014, Nature.

[6]  S. Eckhardt,et al.  Targeting nuclear kinases in cancer: development of cell cycle kinase inhibitors. , 2014, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  S. Singh,et al.  Extra precision docking, free energy calculation and molecular dynamics simulation studies of CDK2 inhibitors. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  R. Coombes,et al.  Development of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor devoid of ABC transporter-dependent drug resistance , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  L. Meijer,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors closer to market launch? , 2013, Expert opinion on therapeutic patents.

[10]  J. Byrd,et al.  Emerging drug profile: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors , 2013, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[11]  M. Noble,et al.  Comparative Structural and Functional Studies of 4-(Thiazol-5-yl)-2-(phenylamino)pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile CDK9 Inhibitors Suggest the Basis for Isotype Selectivity , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Genetic inactivation of Cdk7 leads to cell cycle arrest and induces premature aging due to adult stem cell exhaustion , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[13]  J. Węsierska‐Gądek,et al.  The impact of multi-targeted cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in breast cancer cells: clinical implications , 2011, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[14]  J. Węsierska‐Gądek,et al.  Whether to target single or multiple CDKs for therapy? That is the question , 2011, Journal of cellular physiology.

[15]  Damien Coudreuse,et al.  Driving the cell cycle with a minimal CDK control network , 2010, Nature.

[16]  J. Snyder,et al.  A novel pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine is a potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent protein kinases 1, 2, and 9, which demonstrates antitumor effects in human tumor xenografts following oral administration. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  Peter M Fischer,et al.  Discovery and characterization of 2-anilino-4- (thiazol-5-yl)pyrimidine transcriptional CDK inhibitors as anticancer agents. , 2010, Chemistry & biology.

[18]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Why pyridine containing pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-7-ones selectively inhibit CDK4 than CDK2: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. , 2010, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[19]  Li-Huei Tsai,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  J. Snyder,et al.  The development of a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that shows antitumor activity. , 2009, Cancer research.

[21]  Wang Baoshan,et al.  Interaction mode and selectivity of the 2PU inhibitor with the CDK4 and CDK2 cyclin-dependant kinases: A molecular dynamics study , 2008 .

[22]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Significance of Water Molecules in the Inhibition of Cylin-Dependent Kinase 2 and 5 Complexes , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  Stéphane Larochelle,et al.  Requirements for Cdk7 in the assembly of Cdk1/cyclin B and activation of Cdk2 revealed by chemical genetics in human cells. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[24]  M. Noble,et al.  Dissecting the determinants of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor selectivity. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Chris-Kriton Skylaris,et al.  Novel structural features of CDK inhibition revealed by an ab initio computational method combined with dynamic simulations. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  V. Tan,et al.  Study of the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases with roscovitine and indirubin-3′-oxime from molecular dynamics simulations , 2006, Journal of molecular modeling.

[27]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  W. Windsor,et al.  Ligand binding affinity determined by temperature-dependent circular dichroism: cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitors. , 2005, Analytical biochemistry.

[29]  Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al.  Understanding and modulating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor specificity: molecular modeling and biochemical evaluation of pyrazolopyrimidinones as CDK2/cyclin A and CDK4/cyclin D1 inhibitors , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[30]  Hwangseo Park,et al.  Loop Flexibility and Solvent Dynamics as Determinants for the Selective Inhibition of Cyclin‐Dependent Kinase 4: Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of CDK2 and CDK4 , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[31]  L. Johnson,et al.  The crystal structure of human CDK7 and its protein recognition properties. , 2004, Structure.

[32]  Pierre Dubus,et al.  Mammalian Cells Cycle without the D-Type Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6 , 2004, Cell.

[33]  P. Kaldis,et al.  Cdk2 Knockout Mice Are Viable , 2003, Current Biology.

[34]  Pierre Dubus,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Su-Ying Wu,et al.  Discovery of a novel family of CDK inhibitors with the program LIDAEUS: structural basis for ligand-induced disordering of the activation loop. , 2003, Structure.

[36]  Frank McCormick,et al.  Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[37]  M. Barbacid,et al.  To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer , 2001, Nature reviews. Cancer.

[38]  T Honma,et al.  Crystallographic Approach to Identification of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4 (CDK4)-specific Inhibitors by Using CDK4 Mimic CDK2 Protein* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Targeted Disruption of CDK4 Delays Cell Cycle Entry with Enhanced p27Kip1 Activity , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[40]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Loss of Cdk4 expression causes insulin-deficient diabetes and Cdk4 activation results in β-islet cell hyperplasia , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[41]  Kornelia Polyak,et al.  Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclinA-CDK2 complex , 1995, Nature.

[42]  R. Young,et al.  Association of Cdk-activating kinase subunits with transcription factor TFIIH , 1995, Nature.

[43]  David O. Morgan,et al.  A novel cyclin associates with M015/CDK7 to form the CDK-activating kinase , 1994, Cell.

[44]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Human general transcription factor IIH phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II , 1992, Nature.

[46]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Inhibitors of cell cycle kinases: recent advances and future prospects as cancer therapeutics. , 2012, Critical reviews in oncogenesis.

[47]  James R Bischoff,et al.  CDK inhibitors in cancer therapy: what is next? , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.