fMRI of developmental stuttering: A pilot study

The purpose of this investigation was to explore the feasibility of fMRI in the study of developmental stuttering. Speech contrasts (loud versus silent reading) and language contrasts (reading of semantically meaningful text versus nonsense words) of six developmental stutterers and six nonstutterers were compared using a commercial 1 Tesla MR-Scanner (Siemens Expert). Results indicate that mapping cortical function in persons who stutter is indeed feasible, even with a 1TMR-system. Compared to normals the stutterers seemed to employ different and particularly less differentiated auditory and motor feedback strategies in speech. They apparently rely on auditory processing and on cerebellar contribution as much during silent reading as during reading aloud. Moreover, they showed a greater involvement of the right hemisphere in language processing, activating not only the typical language areas on the left but also and with equal magnitude the right side homologues of these areas. In spite of the promising results, at present several practical problems such as possible movement artifacts and possible masking through scanner noise still hamper a more straightforward use of fMRI in the study of developmental stuttering.

[1]  R K Jones,et al.  Observations on stammering after localized cerebral injury. , 1966, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[3]  J. Rosenthal.  SPEECH PATHOLOGY , 1978, Medical Journal of Australia.

[4]  J. Kalinowski,et al.  Fluency effect of frequency alterations of plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octave shifts in auditory feedback of people who stutter. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  H. Dorn,et al.  Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death. Vol. I , 1950 .

[6]  A. L. Leiner,et al.  Cognitive and language functions of the human cerebellum , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  R. Ingham,et al.  A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering , 1996, Nature.

[8]  O. Bloodstein.  A handbook on stuttering , 1969 .

[9]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Brain Activation for Language, with an Emphasis on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review , 1998, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[10]  R. Ingham.  Stuttering and behavior therapy : current status and experimental foundations , 1984 .

[11]  S. T. Orton.  STUDIES IN STUTTERING: INTRODUCTION , 1927 .

[12]  W. Grodd,et al.  Does the cerebellum contribute to cognitive aspects of speech production? A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  F. Silverman.  Stuttering and other fluency disorders , 1995 .

[14]  J. Wu,et al.  Increased dopamine activity associated with stuttering , 1997, Neuroreport.

[15]  Pascal van Lieshout,et al.  Speech production : motor control, brain research and fluency disorders , 1997 .

[16]  R. Ingham,et al.  Functional-lesion investigation of developmental stuttering with positron emission tomography. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  J. Wu,et al.  A positron emission tomography [18F]deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[18]  N. Ratner,et al.  Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap , 1999 .

[19]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  18 – Imaging Brain Function with Positron Emission Tomography , 2002 .

[20]  Robert J. Logan,et al.  The Three Dimensions of Stuttering: Neurology Behavior and Emotion , 1990 .