Further Development and Validation of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS)

Background Affordances in the home environment may play a significant role in infant motor development. Objective The purpose of this study was to further develop and validate the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS), an inventory that measures the quantity and quality of motor affordances in the home. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate criteria for content validity, reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability of the instrument. Methods A pilot version of the inventory with 5 dimensions was used for expert panel analysis and administered to parents of infants (N=419). Data were analyzed with Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), ceiling and floor effects, and item and dimension interpretability analyses for creation of a scoring system with descriptive categories for each dimension and total score. Results Average agreement among the expert panel was 95% across all evaluation criteria. Cronbach alpha values with the 41-item scale ranged between .639 and .824 for the separate dimensions, with a total value of .824 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=.781, .862). The ICC values were .990 for interrater reliability and .949 for intrarater reliability. There was a ceiling effect on 3 questions for the Inside Space dimension and on 3 questions for the Variety of Stimulation dimension. These results demonstrated the need for reduction in total items (from 41 to 35) and the combination of space dimensions. After removal of questions, internal consistency was .766 (95% CI=.729, .800) for total score. Overall assessment categories were created as: less than adequate, moderately adequate, adequate, and excellent. Limitations The inventory does not determine specific use (time, frequency) of affordances in the home, and it does not account for infants' out-of-home activities. Conclusions The AHEMD-IS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess affordances in the home environment that promote infant motor development.

[1]  M. Larsson,et al.  Measuring Evidence-Based Practice in Physical Therapy: Translation, Adaptation, Further Development, Validation, and Reliability Test of a Questionnaire , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[2]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events , 2000 .

[3]  Catherine S. Taylor,et al.  Expanding the Scoring System for the Dynamic Gait Index , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[4]  Alberto Cordova,et al.  Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development: A Cross-Cultural Study between American and Lebanese Children , 2013 .

[5]  James Cole Galloway,et al.  Early Intensive Postural and Movement Training Advances Head Control in Very Young Infants , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[6]  P. Silveira,et al.  Impact of perinatal different intrauterine environments on child growth and development in the first six months of life - IVAPSA birth cohort: rationale, design, and methods , 2012, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[7]  Rob A B Oostendorp,et al.  Development of a Movement Quality Measurement Tool for Children , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[8]  A brief observational instrument for the assessment of infant home environment: development and psychometric testing , 2012, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[9]  S. Walker,et al.  Commentary: Early stimulation and child development. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Es Habib,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A QUESTIONNAIRE TO DETECT ATYPICAL BEHAVIOR IN INFANTS , 2007 .

[11]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Development and Construct Validation of an Inventory for Assessing the Home Environment for Motor Development , 2005, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  Leigh M. Smith,et al.  The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. , 2008, Human movement science.

[13]  S. Harris,et al.  Content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[14]  Priscila Caçola,et al.  Effect of the home environment on motor and cognitive behavior of infants. , 2012, Infant behavior & development.

[15]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  Associations of biological factors and affordances in the home with infant motor development , 2013, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[16]  Priscila Caçola,et al.  Family socioeconomic status and the provision of motor affordances in the home. , 2013, Brazilian journal of physical therapy.

[17]  Priscila Caçola,et al.  Development of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale , 2011, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[18]  Pau-Chung Chen,et al.  Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the home environment measure for motor development , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  E. Thelen,et al.  Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. , 2006, Psychological review.

[20]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Infant motor development is associated with adult cognitive categorisation in a longitudinal birth cohort study. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[22]  L. B. Dahl,et al.  Early Intervention Improves Behavioral Outcomes for Preterm Infants: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Pediatrics.

[23]  R. Bradley,et al.  A Factor Analytic Study of the Infant-Toddler and Early Childhood Versions of the Home Inventory , 1993 .

[24]  L. Samuelson,et al.  Seeing the world through a third eye: Developmental systems theory looks beyond the nativist-empiricist debate. , 2009, Child development perspectives.

[25]  L. Magalhães,et al.  Criação de questionário para detecção de comportamentos atípicos em bebês , 2007 .

[26]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Influence of Affordances in the Home Environment on Motor Development of Young Children in Japan , 2013 .

[27]  Bette R. Bonder,et al.  Chapter 2: Planning the Initial Verson , 1989 .

[28]  A. Weaver,et al.  Development and Validation of a Self-Report Lower-Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire in Women , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[29]  F. Morrison,et al.  The nature and impact of changes in home learning environment on development of language and academic skills in preschool children. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[30]  C. Ramey,et al.  Home Environment and Cognitive Development in the First 3 Years of Life: A Collaborative Study Involving Six Sites and Three Ethnic Groups in North America , 1989 .

[31]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[32]  L. Doyle,et al.  Can the home environment promote resilience for children born very preterm in the context of social and medical risk? , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  D. Bartlett,et al.  Development of the Daily Activities of Infants Scale: a measure supporting early motor development , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.