Recommendations from a global cross-company data sharing initiative on the incorporation of recovery phase animals in safety assessment studies to support first-in-human clinical trials.

An international expert group which includes 30 organisations (pharmaceutical companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) has shared data on the use of recovery animals in the assessment of pharmaceutical safety for early development. These data have been used as an evidence-base to make recommendations on the inclusion of recovery animals in toxicology studies to achieve scientific objectives, while reducing animal use. Recovery animals are used in pharmaceutical development to provide information on the potential for a toxic effect to translate into long-term human risk. They are included on toxicology studies to assess whether effects observed during dosing persist or reverse once treatment ends. The group devised a questionnaire to collect information on the use of recovery animals in general regulatory toxicology studies to support first-in-human studies. Questions focused on study design, the rationale behind inclusion or exclusion and the impact this had on internal and regulatory decisions. Data on 137 compounds (including 53 biologicals and 78 small molecules) from 259 studies showed wide variation in where, when and why recovery animals were included. An analysis of individual study and programme design shows that there are opportunities to reduce the use of recovery animals without impacting drug development.

[1]  Paul Baldrick,et al.  Safety evaluation to support First-In-Man investigations II: toxicology studies. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Rafael Ponce,et al.  Duration of chronic toxicity studies for biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals: is 6 months still appropriate? , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  Paul Baldrick,et al.  Safety evaluation of biological drugs: what are toxicology studies in primates telling us? , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  G. Foley,et al.  Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies , 2013, Toxicologic pathology.

[5]  Sally Robinson,et al.  Reduction in dog numbers in regulatory one-month toxicology studies without compromising scientific quality: Challenging the status quo , 2010 .

[6]  Jennifer Sims,et al.  Safety and immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies , 2010, mAbs.

[7]  Robert Combes,et al.  Optimising the design of preliminary toxicity studies for pharmaceutical safety testing in the dog. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Ian Ragan,et al.  Preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies , 2009, mAbs.

[9]  M. Leach,et al.  Appropriate Use of Recovery Groups in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies: Value in a Science-Driven Case-by-Case Approach , 2012, Veterinary Pathology-Supplement.

[10]  I. Grewal,et al.  Practical considerations for nonclinical safety evaluation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies , 2009, mAbs.

[11]  Sally Robinson,et al.  Opportunities to minimise animal use in pharmaceutical regulatory general toxicology: a cross-company review. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  Jennifer Sims,et al.  The design of chronic toxicology studies of monoclonal antibodies: implications for the reduction in use of non-human primates. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Kathryn L Chapman,et al.  The future of non-human primate use in mAb development. , 2010, Drug discovery today.