Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling

This article explores the relationship between the method of process tracing and the data collection technique of elite interviewing. The process tracing method has become an increasingly used and cited tool in qualitative research, a trend that has recently accelerated with the publication of Alexander George and Andrew Bennett's text (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. That book outlines and explores the process tracing method in detail, highlighting its advantages for exploring causal processes and analyzing complex decision-making. Yet while the book presents a rigorous and compelling account of the process tracing method and its critical importance to case study research, the value of the method itself remains contested in some quarters, and there are aspects of George and Bennett's treatment of it that require further exploration.

[1]  Karen Farquharson.  A Different Kind of Snowball: Identifying Key Policymakers , 2005 .

[2]  B. Rockman,et al.  In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive , 2000 .

[3]  David Collier,et al.  Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology , 2004 .

[4]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[5]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[6]  R. Putnam,et al.  Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies , 1981 .

[7]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Critiques, Responses, and Trade-Offs: Drawing Together the Debate , 2004 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Berry,et al.  Validity and Reliability Issues In Elite Interviewing , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[9]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[10]  Jeffrey T. Checkel.  Tracing Causal Mechanisms , 2006 .

[11]  Colin Elman,et al.  Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods , 2006 .

[12]  Lawrence S. Falkowski.  Psychological Models In International Politics , 1980 .

[13]  J. Mahoney.  Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis , 2000 .

[14]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[15]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[16]  P. Davies.  Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services , 2001 .

[17]  B. Rockman,et al.  Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[18]  K. Goldstein.  Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[19]  P. Kozyreva,et al.  Interviewing Political Elites: Lessons from Russia , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[20]  Anthony Seldon,et al.  By Word of Mouth: Elite Oral History , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[21]  David A. Welch,et al.  Remembering the Cuban Missile Crisis: Should We Swallow Oral History? , 1990 .

[22]  L. Dexter.  Elite and specialized interviewing , 1971 .

[23]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[24]  ELITE INTERVIEWING AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE: AN EXAMPLE FROM YUGOSLAVIA , 1972 .

[25]  Robert Lover,et al.  Rules of Inference , 2008 .

[26]  N. Hanley,et al.  Validity and reliability , 2002 .