Correlation of forebody pressures and aircraft yawing moments on the X-29A aircraft at high angles of attack

In-flight pressure distributions at four fuselage stations on the forebody of the X-29A aircraft have been reported at angles of attack from 15 to 66 deg and at Mach numbers from 0.22 to 0.60. At angles of attack of 20 deg and higher, vortices shed from the nose strake caused suction peaks in the pressure distributions that generally increased in magnitude with angle of attack. Above 30 deg-angle of attack, the forebody pressure distributions became asymmetrical at the most forward station, while they remained nearly symmetrical until 50 to 55 deg-angle of attack for the aft stations. Between 59 to 66 deg-angle of attack, the asymmetry of the pressure distributions changed direction. Yawing moments for the forebody alone were obtained by integrating the forebody pressure distributions. At 45 deg-angle of attack, the aircraft yaws to the right and at 50 deg and higher, the aircraft yaws to the left. The forebody yawing moments correlated well with the aircraft left yawing moment at an angle of attack of 50 deg or higher. At a 45 deg-angle of attack, the forebody yawing moments did not correlate well with the aircraft yawing moment, but it is suggested that this was due to asymmetric pressures on the cockpit region of the fuselage which was not instrumented. The forebody was also shown to provide a positive component of directional stability of the aircraft at angles of attack of 25 deg or higher. A Mach number effect was noted at angles of attack of 30 deg or higher at the station where the nose strake was present. At this station, the suction peaks in the pressure distributions at the highest Mach number were reduced and much more symmetrical as compared to the lower Mach number pressure distributions.

[1]  John H. Del Frate,et al.  In-flight flow field analysis on the NASA F-18 high alpha research vehicle with comparisons to ground facility data , 1990 .

[2]  Frederick R Webster,et al.  X-29 High Angle-of-Attack Flying Qualities , 1991 .

[3]  Sue B. Grafton,et al.  High angle-of-attack characteristics of a forward-swept wing fighter configuration , 1982 .

[4]  Brian L. Hunt,et al.  Asymmetric vortex forces and wakes on slen-der bodies , 1982 .

[5]  Vladislav Klein,et al.  Aerodynamic parameters of the X-31 drop model estimated from flight-data at high angles of attack , 1992 .

[6]  G. T. Chapman,et al.  Side forces on forebodies at high angles of attack and Mach numbers from 0.1 to 0.7: two tangent ogives, paraboloid and cone , 1977 .

[7]  L. T. Nguyen,et al.  Wind-tunnel free-flight investigation of a model of a forward-swept-wing fighter configuration , 1984 .

[8]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  Preliminary results from a subsonic high angle-of-attack flush airdata sensing (HI-FADS) system: Design, calibration, and flight test evaluation , 1990 .

[9]  P. J. Lamont Pressure measurements on an ogive-cylinder at high angles of attack with laminar, transitional, or turbulent separation , 1980 .

[10]  J. R. Chambers,et al.  Wind-tunnel free-flight investigation of a model of a spin-resistant fighter configuration , 1974 .

[11]  D. Frei,et al.  X-29 forward swept wing aerodynamic overview , 1983 .

[12]  David M. Richwine,et al.  In-Flight Flow Visualization Characteristics of the NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle at High Angles of Attack , 1989 .

[13]  G. T. Chapman,et al.  Side forces on a tangent ogive forebody with a fineness ratio of 3.5 at high angles of attack and Mach numbers from 0.1 to 0.7 , 1977 .

[14]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  A preliminary look at techniques used to obtain airdata from flight at high angles of attack , 1990 .