LiDAR as a rapid tool to predict forest habitat types in Natura 2000 networks

Management strategies for the conservation of biodiversity can be developed only with precise information on the spatial distribution of organisms on relevant, mostly regional, spatial scales. Current surrogates for approximating the distribution of biodiversity are habitats mapped within a number of national and international frameworks (e.g., Natura 2000), even though conventional habitat mapping is time consuming and requires well-trained personnel. Here we evaluated the use of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) to map forest habitat types to simplify the process. We used available data of habitat types for the Bavarian Forest National Park as a basis to predict habitat types with LiDAR-derived variables. Furthermore, we compared these results with predictions based on extensive ground-based climate, soil and vegetation data. Using linear and flexible discriminant analyses, we found that LiDAR is able to predict forest habitat types with the same overall accuracy as the extensive ground data for climate, soil and vegetation composition. Subtle differences in the vegetation structure between habitat types, particularly in the vertical and horizontal vegetation profiles, were captured by LiDAR. These differences in the physiognomy were in part caused by changes in altitude, which also influence tree species composition. We propose that the most-efficient way to identify forest habitat types according Natura 2000 is to combine remote-sensing LiDAR data with well-directed field surveys.

[1]  Markus Holopainen,et al.  Airborne small-footprint discrete-return LiDAR data in the assessment of boreal mire surface patterns, vegetation, and habitats , 2009 .

[2]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. , 2008, Ecology.

[3]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[4]  C. Körner.  The use of 'altitude' in ecological research. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Jussi Peuhkurinen,et al.  Identification of boreal forest stands with high herbaceous plant diversity using airborne laser scanning , 2009 .

[6]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. , 2009 .

[7]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2003 .

[8]  D. Currie.  Scaling Biodiversity: Regional-to-global patterns of biodiversity, and what they have to say about mechanisms , 2007 .

[9]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  The application of Lidar in woodland bird ecology: climate, canopy structure and habitat quality , 2006 .

[10]  R. Shine,et al.  CANOPY STRUCTURE, MICROCLIMATE, AND HABITAT SELECTION BY A NOCTURNAL SNAKE, HOPLOCEPHALUS BUNGAROIDES , 2003 .

[11]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Estimation of standing dead tree class distributions in northwest coastal forests using lidar remote sensing , 2009 .

[12]  J. Müller,et al.  The BIOKLIM Project: Biodiversity Research between Climate Change and Wilding in a temperate montane forest - The conceptual framework , 2009 .

[13]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Estimation of the extinction risk for high-montane species as a consequence of global warming and assessment of their suitability as cross-taxon indicators , 2010 .

[14]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[15]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[16]  Roland Brandl,et al.  Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages , 2009 .

[17]  Antoine Collin,et al.  Salt-marsh characterization, zonation assessment and mapping through a dual-wavelength LiDAR , 2010 .

[18]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[19]  Vassiliki Kati,et al.  Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale , 2004 .

[20]  P. Gessler,et al.  Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: An evaluation for the Inland Northwest, USA , 2009 .

[21]  G. Graves,et al.  Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  G. Henebry,et al.  Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions , 2009 .

[23]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology , 2002 .

[24]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area , 2008 .

[25]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: A case study with Norway spruce , 2010 .

[26]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[27]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[28]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[29]  Angela Cropper,et al.  Convention on Biological Diversity , 1993, Environmental Conservation.

[30]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[31]  L. Vierling,et al.  Spinning a laser web: predicting spider distributions using LiDAR. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning , 2010 .

[33]  H. Andersen,et al.  A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Estimating Forest Biomass from Light Detection and Ranging Data , 2008 .

[34]  R. Brandl,et al.  Diversity of mammals in the tropical–temperate Neotropics: hotspots on a regional scale , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[35]  K. Jones,et al.  Quantifying structural physical habitat attributes using LIDAR and hyperspectral imagery , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[36]  E. Næsset.  Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2009 .

[37]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. , 2005 .

[38]  G. Londo.  The decimal scale for releves of permanent quadrats , 1976, Vegetatio.

[39]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  The Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 Target , 2005, Science.

[40]  J. Strobl,et al.  SAGA-analysis and modelling applications , 2006 .

[41]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Leave-One-Out Procedures for Nonparametric Error Estimates , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[42]  Carl W. Ramm,et al.  Correct Formation of the Kappa Coefficient of Agreement , 1987 .

[43]  Luigi Boitani,et al.  Contribution of the Natura 2000 Network to Biodiversity Conservation in Italy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[44]  C. Bibby,et al.  Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation , 1992 .