Comparing CAVE, wall, and desktop displays for navigation and wayfinding in complex 3D models

Computer-aided design (CAD) and 3D visualization techniques are at the heart of many engineering processes such as aircraft, ship, and automobile design. These visualization tasks require users to navigate or wayfind through complex 3D geometric models consisting of millions of parts. Despite numerous studies, it remains unclear whether large-screen displays improve user performance for such activities. We present a user study comparing standard desktop, immersive room (i.e., CAVE), and wall displays with 3D stereo/head-tracking, and mono/no head-tracking. We observed individual differences between users and found that the presence of contextual structure greatly impacted performance, suggesting that providing structure and developing interaction techniques accommodating a wide range of users yields better performance than focusing on display characteristics alone

[1]  W W Somers,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE STEREOSCOPIC THRESHOLD UTILIZING PERCEIVED DEPTH , 1984, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[4]  Randy Pausch,et al.  A user study comparing head-mounted and stationary displays , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE Research Properties in Virtual Reality Symposium.

[5]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Immersion in desktop virtual reality , 1997, UIST '97.

[7]  Colin Ware,et al.  Context sensitive flying interface , 1997, SI3D.

[8]  Im,et al.  The Earth is spherical ( p < 0 : 05): alternative methods of statistical inference , 2000 .

[9]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Exploring 3D navigation: combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting , 2001, CHI.

[10]  David J. Kasik,et al.  Evaluating Graphic Displays for Complex 3D Models , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[11]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.

[12]  Bruce H. Thomas,et al.  Tangible User Interaction Using Augmented Reality , 2002, AUIC.

[13]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance , 2003, CHI '03.

[14]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.