Needle-free delivery of macromolecules across the skin by nanoliter-volume pulsed microjets

Needle-free liquid jet injectors were invented >50 years ago for the delivery of proteins and vaccines. Despite their long history, needle-free liquid jet injectors are not commonly used as a result of frequent pain and bruising. We hypothesized that pain and bruising originate from the deep penetration of the jets and can potentially be addressed by minimizing the penetration depth of jets into the skin. However, current jet injectors are not designed to maintain shallow dermal penetration depths. Using a new strategy of jet injection, pulsed microjets, we report on delivery of protein drugs into the skin without deep penetration. The high velocity (v >100 m/s) of microjets allows their entry into the skin, whereas the small jet diameters (50–100 μm) and extremely small volumes (2–15 nanoliters) limit the penetration depth (≈200 μm). In vitro experiments confirmed quantitative delivery of molecules into human skin and in vivo experiments with rats confirmed the ability of pulsed microjets to deliver therapeutic doses of insulin across the skin. Pulsed microjet injectors could be used to deliver drugs for local as well as systemic applications without using needles.

[1]  T. Jakob,et al.  Epidermal Langerhans cells: from neurons to nature's adjuvants. , 1999, Advances in dermatology.

[2]  N. Kollias,et al.  Transdermal drug delivery with a pressure wave. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[3]  Aarti Naik,et al.  Iontophoretic drug delivery. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Pulsed liquid microjet for microsurgery , 2001 .

[5]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Current status and future prospects of needle-free liquid jet injectors , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[6]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Transdermal Drug Delivery by Jet Injectors: Energetics of Jet Formation and Penetration , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[7]  J. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  F. Pass,et al.  Delivery of insulin by jet injection: recent observations. , 2001, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  M. Kermode Unsafe injections in low-income country health settings: need for injection safety promotion to prevent the spread of blood-borne viruses. , 2004, Health promotion international.

[10]  G. Glenn,et al.  Transcutaneous immunization: an emerging route of immunization and potent immunostimulation strategy. , 2001, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[11]  J Kost,et al.  Effect of ultrasound on transdermal drug delivery to rats and guinea pigs. , 1989, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  J. Spivak The anaemia of cancer: death by a thousand cuts , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  P A Singer,et al.  Grand Challenges in Global Health , 2003, Science.

[14]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  M. Marmor,et al.  Intravascular drug delivery with a pulsed liquid microjet. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery , 1995, Science.

[17]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Immunization without needles , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[18]  Mark G. Allen,et al.  Lack of pain associated with microfabricated microneedles. , 2001 .

[19]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Discovery of transdermal penetration enhancers by high-throughput screening , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Needle-free jet injections: dependence of jet penetration and dispersion in the skin on jet power. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[21]  K. Shung,et al.  Hydrogels with enhanced mass transfer for transdermal drug delivery. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.