Enactment theory as a paradigm for enabling flexible workflows

This paper proposes collective enactment theory as an alternative to speech acts or situated actions as the basis for workflow systems. Enactment theory goes beyond the conventional scope of theories of action by acknowledging tiordances in the environment, needs of individuals and organizations, decision and preparation, motivation, planning and scheduling, execution, evaluation, and consequential changes in the organization and their environment. This encompassing scope allows to overcome limitations of current workflow systems and to integrate a large range of organizational and individual behavior. Particular emphasis in this paper is given to organizational activities that precede or follow the planning, scheduling, and execution of organizational work. The integration of planning and scheduling activities in enactment theory is shown and implications for workflow design and architectures are delineated.

[1]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[2]  Edward A. Wasil,et al.  Project management using a microcomputer , 1986, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Christopher Stuart,et al.  An Implementation of a Multi-Agent Plan Synchronizer , 1985, IJCAI.

[4]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  OfficeTalk-D: An experimental office information system , 1982 .

[5]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[6]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Callisto: An Intelligent Project Management System , 1986, AI Mag..

[7]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[8]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  Flexible, active support for collaborative work with ConversationBuilder , 1992, CSCW '92.

[9]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Office Information Systems and Computer Science , 1980, CSUR.

[10]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[11]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Planning and Execution of Tasks in Cooperative Work Environments , 1989 .

[12]  Steven A. Vere,et al.  Planning in Time: Windows and Durations for Activities and Goals , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Kent D. Bimson,et al.  Assisting managers in project definition: foundations for intelligent decision support , 1989, IEEE Expert.

[14]  Brad Hartfield,et al.  Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction , 1988, TOIS.

[15]  J. Searle Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[16]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  Domain-Independent Planning: Representation and Plan Generation , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[18]  M. Frese,et al.  Goal Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology , 1985 .