Predicting the Benefits of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on 1-Year Angina and Quality of Life in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Risk Models From the COURAGE Trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation)

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a therapy to reduce angina and improve quality of life in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, it is unclear whether the quality of life after PCI is more dependent on the PCI or other patient-related factors. To address this question, we created models to predict angina and quality of life 1 year after PCI and medical therapy. Methods and Results: Using data from the 2287 stable ischemic heart disease patients randomized in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) to PCI plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone, we built prediction models for 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency, physical limitation, and quality of life scores, both as continuous outcomes and categorized by clinically desirable states, using multivariable techniques. Although most patients improved regardless of treatment, marked variability was observed in Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores 1 year after randomization. Adding PCI conferred a greater mean improvement (about 2 points) in Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores that were not affected by patient characteristics (P values for all interactions >0.05). The proportion of patients free of angina or having very good/excellent physical limitation (physical function) or quality of life at 1 year was 57%, 58%, 66% with PCI+OMT and 50%, 55%, 59% with OMT alone group, respectively. However, other characteristics, such as baseline symptoms, age, diabetes mellitus, and the magnitude of myocardium subtended by narrowed coronary arteries were as, or more, important than revascularization in predicting symptoms (partial R2=0.07 versus 0.29, 0.03 versus 0.22, and 0.05 versus 0.24 in the domain of angina frequency, physical limitation, and quality of life, respectively). There was modest/good discrimination of the models (C statistic=0.72–0.82) and excellent calibration (coefficients of determination for predicted versus observed deciles=0.83–0.97). Conclusions: The health status outcomes of stable ischemic heart disease patients treated by OMT+PCI versus OMT alone can be predicted with modest accuracy. Angina and quality of life at 1 year is improved by PCI but is more strongly associated with other patient characteristics. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00007657.

[1]  S. Thom,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[2]  Liang Li,et al.  Joint multiple imputation for longitudinal outcomes and clinical events that truncate longitudinal follow‐up , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  H. Krumholz,et al.  The New Era of Informed Consent: Getting to a Reasonable-Patient Standard Through Shared Decision Making. , 2016, JAMA.

[4]  Zhongheng Zhang,et al.  Model building strategy for logistic regression: purposeful selection. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[5]  D. Kent,et al.  Development and validation of a simplified Stroke–Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument , 2015, Neurology.

[6]  J. Spertus,et al.  Prediction of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2015, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[7]  J. Spertus,et al.  Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study. , 2015, American heart journal.

[8]  Michael E. Matheny,et al.  Validated Contemporary Risk Model of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Cath‐PCI Registry , 2014, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[9]  J. Spertus,et al.  Comparison of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire With Daily Angina Diary in the TERISA Clinical Trial , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[10]  J. Spertus,et al.  Variation in patients’ perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Spertus,et al.  Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[12]  Stephen D. Persell,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI/AMA-Convened PCPI/NCQA 2013 Performance Measures for Adults Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the Amer , 2014, Circulation.

[13]  J. Spertus,et al.  Derivation and Validation of a Risk Standardization Model for Benchmarking Hospital Performance for Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2014, Circulation.

[14]  Mandeep Singh,et al.  An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Daniel S Berman,et al.  Frequency, Predictors, and Consequences of Crossing Over to Revascularization Within 12 Months of Randomization to Optimal Medical Therapy in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[16]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Spertus,et al.  Selecting Antiplatelet Therapy at the Time of Percutaneous Intervention for an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Weighing the Benefits and Risks of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  G. Levine,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Circulation.

[21]  Y. Schenker,et al.  Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. , 2011, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  David M Kent,et al.  Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal , 2010, Trials.

[23]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. , 2010, JAMA.

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  Impact of an initial strategy of medical therapy without percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  Zoran Bursac,et al.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression , 2008, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[27]  J. Spertus Evolving Applications for Patient-Centered Health Status Measures , 2008, Circulation.

[28]  Gabriel E. Soto,et al.  Converting the Informed Consent From a Perfunctory Process to an Evidence-Based Foundation for Patient Decision Making , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[29]  Stanley E. Kaufman,et al.  Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[31]  O. Ozkan,et al.  Expected treatment benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the patient’s perspective , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[32]  Grace A Lin,et al.  Cardiologists' use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  J. Spertus,et al.  Bedside estimation of risk from percutaneous coronary intervention: the new Mayo Clinic risk scores. , 2007, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[34]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Stanley E. Kaufman,et al.  Economics methods in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing percutaneous coronary Revascularization and Aggressive Guideline-driven drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. , 2006, American heart journal.

[36]  D. Berman,et al.  Design and rationale of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program no. 424. , 2006, American heart journal.

[37]  David M Kent,et al.  Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[38]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[39]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Predictors of Quality-of-Life Benefit After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004, Circulation.

[40]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[41]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina. Health service costs based on the second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. , 2002, European heart journal.

[42]  Peter C Austin,et al.  A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. , 2002, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[43]  D. Fairclough Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[44]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[45]  D. Waters,et al.  Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review , 1997 .

[47]  R A Deyo,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  J. Spertus,et al.  Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[49]  P. Hartigan,et al.  A Comparison of Angioplasty With Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease , 1992 .

[50]  P. Hartigan,et al.  A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  R. A. Johnson,et al.  Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  B. Gersh Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease , 2009 .

[53]  W. Howard,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease , 2008 .

[54]  M. Escobar,et al.  The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status , 2004, Quality of Life Research.