Comparison of Implicit vs. Explicit Regime Identification in Machine Learning Methods for Solar Irradiance Prediction

This work compares the solar power forecasting performance of tree-based methods that include implicit regime-based models to explicit regime separation methods that utilize both unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques. Previous studies have shown an improvement utilizing a regime-based machine learning approach in a climate with diverse cloud conditions. This study compares the machine learning approaches for solar power prediction at the Shagaya Renewable Energy Park in Kuwait, which is in an arid desert climate characterized by abundant sunshine. The regime-dependent artificial neural network models undergo a comprehensive parameter and hyperparameter tuning analysis to minimize the prediction errors on a test dataset. The final results that compare the different methods are computed on an independent validation dataset. The results show that the tree-based methods, the regression model tree approach, performs better than the explicit regime-dependent approach. These results appear to be a function of the predominantly sunny conditions that limit the ability of an unsupervised technique to separate regimes for which the relationship between the predictors and the predictand would differ for the supervised learning technique.

[1]  J. Kleissl,et al.  Chapter 8 – Overview of Solar-Forecasting Methods and a Metric for Accuracy Evaluation , 2013 .

[2]  Dong Huang,et al.  3D cloud detection and tracking system for solar forecast using multiple sky imagers , 2015 .

[3]  L. Dubus Weather and Climate and the Power Sector: Needs, Recent Developments and Challenges , 2014 .

[4]  J. R. Quinlan Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[5]  S. E. Haupt,et al.  Regime-Dependent Short-Range Solar Irradiance Forecasting , 2016 .

[6]  N. Rahim,et al.  Solar photovoltaic generation forecasting methods: A review , 2018 .

[7]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  A consensus forecasting approach for improved turbine hub height wind speed predictions , 2011 .

[8]  Dipti Srinivasan,et al.  Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[9]  S. E. Haupt,et al.  The Role of Unresolved Clouds on Short-Range Global Horizontal Irradiance Predictability , 2016 .

[10]  S. E. Haupt,et al.  A Wind Power Forecasting System to Optimize Grid Integration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[11]  S. Miller,et al.  Short-term solar irradiance forecasting via satellite/model coupling , 2017, Solar Energy.

[12]  J. Heiser Improvements in Solar Power Forecasting , 2018 .

[13]  S. E. Haupt,et al.  A regime-dependent artificial neural network technique for short-range solar irradiance forecasting , 2016 .

[14]  Jean-Laurent Duchaud,et al.  Solar irradiation prediction with machine learning: Forecasting models selection method depending on weather variability , 2018, Energy.

[15]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[16]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[17]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Solar Forecasting: Methods, Challenges, and Performance , 2015, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[18]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review , 2017 .

[19]  Barbara Hammer,et al.  Neural Smithing – Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks , 2001, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[20]  Yu Xie,et al.  Building the Sun4Cast System: Improvements in Solar Power Forecasting , 2017 .

[21]  C. Gueymard,et al.  Performance evaluation of a utility-scale dual-technology photovoltaic power plant at the Shagaya Renewable Energy Park in Kuwait , 2020 .

[22]  S. E. Haupt,et al.  WRF-Solar: Description and Clear-Sky Assessment of an Augmented NWP Model for Solar Power Prediction , 2016 .

[23]  E. Lorenz,et al.  Overview of Irradiance and Photovoltaic Power Prediction , 2014 .

[24]  A. Staniforth,et al.  The Operational CMC–MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) Model. Part I: Design Considerations and Formulation , 1998 .

[25]  Shian‐Jiann Lin,et al.  Toward Convective-Scale Prediction within the Next Generation Global Prediction System , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.