In vitro bioanalytical evaluation of removal efficiency for bioactive chemicals in Swedish wastewater treatment plants

[1]  B. Escher,et al.  What is driving the NF-κB response in environmental water extracts? , 2018, Chemosphere.

[2]  Gaëla Leroy,et al.  Analysis of endocrine activity in drinking water, surface water and treated wastewater from six countries. , 2018, Water research.

[3]  A. Oskarsson,et al.  In vitro bioanalysis of drinking water from source to tap. , 2018, Water research.

[4]  D. Villeneuve,et al.  The advantages of linear concentration–response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples , 2018, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  M. Schwientek,et al.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany , 2018, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[6]  B. Escher,et al.  Bioanalytical assessment of adaptive stress responses in drinking water: A predictive tool to differentiate between micropollutants and disinfection by-products. , 2018, Water research.

[7]  A. Oskarsson,et al.  Toxicity bioassays with concentrated cell culture media—a methodology to overcome the chemical loss by conventional preparation of water samples , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Timo Hamers,et al.  Effect-based trigger values for in vitro and in vivo bioassays performed on surface water extracts supporting the environmental quality standards (EQS) of the European Water Framework Directive. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  T. Reemtsma,et al.  Application of cell-based bioassays to evaluate treatment efficacy of conventional and intensified treatment wetlands , 2018 .

[10]  W. Brack,et al.  Effect-based assessment of toxicity removal during wastewater treatment. , 2017, Water research.

[11]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Development of a bioanalytical test battery for water quality monitoring: Fingerprinting identified micropollutants and their contribution to effects in surface water. , 2017, Water research.

[12]  B. Escher,et al.  Exploring the oxidative stress response mechanism triggered by environmental water samples. , 2017, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[13]  M. Denison,et al.  High throughput in vitro and in vivo screening of inland waters of Southern California. , 2017, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[14]  Ron van der Oost,et al.  SIMONI (Smart Integrated Monitoring) as a novel bioanalytical strategy for water quality assessment: Part I–model design and effect‐based trigger values , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  Comparison of in vitro estrogenic activity and estrogen concentrations in source and treated waters from 25 U.S. drinking water treatment plants. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  R. Altenburger,et al.  Integrating chemical analysis and bioanalysis to evaluate the contribution of wastewater effluent on the micropollutant burden in small streams. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  N. Denslow,et al.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays. , 2016, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[18]  N. Creusot,et al.  Proposal to optimize ecotoxicological evaluation of wastewater treated by conventional biological and ozonation processes , 2016, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[19]  Tobias Porsbring,et al.  The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive , 2015, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[20]  Anu Kumar,et al.  Assessment of multiple hormonal activities in wastewater at different stages of treatment , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  Francesco Busetti,et al.  Which chemicals drive biological effects in wastewater and recycled water? , 2014, Water research.

[22]  Tong-Cun Liu,et al.  Monitoring of xenobiotic ligands for human estrogen receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor in industrial wastewater effluents. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  Heather Coleman,et al.  Assessment of wastewater and recycled water quality: a comparison of lines of evidence from in vitro, in vivo and chemical analyses. , 2014, Water research.

[24]  H. Ngo,et al.  A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Benchmarking organic micropollutants in wastewater, recycled water and drinking water with in vitro bioassays. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  B. Escher,et al.  Bioanalytical and chemical assessment of the disinfection by-product formation potential: role of organic matter. , 2013, Water research.

[27]  D. A. Barry,et al.  Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: ozone or powdered activated carbon? , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Annemarie P van Wezel,et al.  Trigger values for investigation of hormonal activity in drinking water and its sources using CALUX bioassays. , 2013, Environment international.

[29]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: the need for effect-based water quality trigger values. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Simon Toze,et al.  Water quality assessment using the AREc32 reporter gene assay indicative of the oxidative stress response pathway. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[31]  M. Bartkow,et al.  Bioanalytical assessment of the formation of disinfection byproducts in a drinking water treatment plant. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Frederic D.L. Leusch,et al.  Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment , 2011 .

[33]  Simon Toze,et al.  Bioanalytical tools for the evaluation of organic micropollutants during sewage treatment, water recycling and drinking water generation. , 2011, Water research.

[34]  Cedric Robillot,et al.  Evaluation of contaminant removal of reverse osmosis and advanced oxidation in full-scale operation by combining passive sampling with chemical analysis and bioanalytical tools. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. , 2009, Water research.

[36]  Y. Lévi,et al.  Evaluation of estrogenic disrupting potency in aquatic environments and urban wastewaters by combining chemical and biological analysis , 2009 .

[37]  Bart Van der Burg,et al.  Detection of multiple hormonal activities in wastewater effluents and surface water, using a panel of steroid receptor CALUX bioassays. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  A. Vinggaard,et al.  Effects of currently used pesticides in the AhR-CALUX assay: comparison between the human TV101L and the rat H4IIE cell line. , 2003, Toxicology.

[39]  J. Meerman,et al.  Detection of estrogenic potency in wastewater and surface water with three in vitro bioassays , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[40]  M. Gros,et al.  Non-target screening and prioritization of potentially persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic domestic wastewater contaminants and their removal in on-site and large-scale sewage treatment plants. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  W. Brack,et al.  Impact of untreated wastewater on a major European river evaluated with a combination of in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[42]  J. Keller,et al.  Monitoring the biological activity of micropollutants during advanced wastewater treatment with ozonation and activated carbon filtration. , 2010, Water research.