The use of nodes attributes in social network analysis with an application to an international trade network

Abstract The social network analysis (SNA) studies the interactions among actors in a network formed through some relationship (friendship, cooperation, trade, among others). The SNA is constantly approached from a binary point of view, i.e., it is only observed if a link between two actors is present or not regardless of the strength of this link. It is known that different information can be obtained in weighted and unweighted networks and that the information extracted from weighted networks is more accurate and detailed. Another rarely discussed approach in the SNA is related to the individual attributes of the actors (nodes), because such analysis is usually focused on the topological structure of networks. Features of the nodes are not incorporated in the SNA what implies that there is some loss or misperception of information in those analyze. This paper aims at exploring more precisely the complexities of a social network, initially developing a method that inserts the individual attributes in the topological structure of the network and then analyzing the network in four different ways: unweighted, edge-weighted and two methods for using both edge-weights and nodes’ attributes. The international trade network was chosen in the application of this approach, where the nodes represent the countries, the links represent the cash flow in the trade transactions and countries’ GDP were chosen as nodes’ attributes. As a result, it is possible to observe which countries are most connected in the world economy and with higher cash flows, to point out the countries that are central to the intermediation of the wealth flow and those that are most benefited from being included in this network. We also made a principal component analysis to study which metrics are more influential in describing the data variability, which turn out to be mostly the weighted metrics which include the nodes’ attributes.

[1]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[2]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  International trade and financial integration: a weighted network analysis , 2010 .

[3]  R. M. Marteleto,et al.  Análise de redes sociais - aplicação nos estudos de transferência da informação , 2001 .

[4]  Giorgio Fagiolo Directed or Undirected? A New Index to Check for Directionality of Relations in Socio-Economic Networks , 2006 .

[5]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. P. Leyden,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[8]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[9]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis , 1986 .

[10]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[11]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[12]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Guangyuan Fu,et al.  A new method to construct co-author networks , 2015 .

[14]  Yong Deng,et al.  Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on AHP , 2017 .

[15]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[16]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Harold D Green,et al.  The Analysis of Duocentric Social Networks: A Primer. , 2015, Journal of marriage and the family.

[18]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[19]  Yong Deng,et al.  A new measure of identifying influential nodes: Efficiency centrality , 2017, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[20]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[21]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[23]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Prominence and control: the weighted rich-club effect. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[24]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[25]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.