A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research

Abstract The application of structural equation modeling (SEM) in the supply chain management (SCM) context has experienced increasing popularity in recent years. Although most researchers are well equipped with a basic understanding of the traditional covariance-based SEM (CBSEM) techniques, they are less familiar with the appropriate use of partial least squares (PLS) SEM. To fill this gap, the current paper critically reviews the use of PLS in 75 articles published in leading SCM journals from 2002 until 2013. The review indicates the potential of PLS, but also its limitations. A comparison across PLS reviews from various disciplines suggests that SCM research applies the same or even higher reporting standards in performing a PLS analysis and reporting the results than other disciplines (e.g., marketing or strategic management) that use PLS. However, SCM researchers often do not fully exploit the method's capabilities, and sometimes they even misapply it. This review thus offers guidelines for the appropriate application of PLS for future SCM research.

[1]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[2]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[3]  C. Carter,et al.  Increasing the rigor of grounded theory research – a review of the SCM literature , 2012 .

[4]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods , 2012 .

[5]  K. Foerstl,et al.  The impact of stakeholder orientation on sustainability and cost prevalence in supplier selection decisions , 2012 .

[6]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Reflections on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2014 .

[7]  E. Hartmann,et al.  THE FLEXIBILITY OF LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ITS IMPACT ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY: The Flexibility of Logistics Service Providers and Its Impact on Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Study , 2011 .

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of Hierarchy, Current Generation, and Complementarities in Consumer Settings , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Tomàs Aluja-Banet,et al.  TOWARD THE DEFINITION OF A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL OF PATENT VALUE: PLS PATH MODELLING WITH FORMATIVE CONSTRUCTS , 2009 .

[10]  Shaun McQuitty,et al.  Statistical power and structural equation models in business research , 2004 .

[11]  William Lewis,et al.  Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? , 2012, MIS Q..

[12]  Ogan Yigitbasioglu,et al.  Information sharing with key suppliers : a transaction cost theory perspective , 2010 .

[13]  D. Bandalos The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling , 2002 .

[14]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling , 2000 .

[15]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[16]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Twenty years of IJLM: evolution in research , 2012 .

[17]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[18]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research , 2014 .

[19]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Causal Indicator Models: Identification, Estimation, and Testing , 2009 .

[20]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Affiliation of Authors in Transportation and Logistics Academic Journals: A Reevaluation , 2009, Transportation Journal.

[21]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results , 2011 .

[22]  Mikko Rönkkö,et al.  A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2013 .

[23]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[24]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[25]  Rosalie J. Hall,et al.  Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary Constructs , 1999 .

[26]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Survey research in operations management: historical analyses , 2003 .

[27]  Peter M Bentler,et al.  On Components, Latent Variables, PLS and Simple Methods: Reactions to Rigdon's Rethinking of PLS. , 2014, Long range planning.

[28]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling , 2008 .

[29]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Using Formative Measures in International Marketing Models: A Cautionary Tale Using Consumer Animosity as an Example , 2011 .

[30]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications , 2012 .

[31]  Alexander E. Ellinger,et al.  Benchmarking leading supply chain management and logistics strategy journals , 2011 .

[32]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[33]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial Least Squares : The Better Approach to Structural Equation Modeling ? , 2012 .

[34]  Mikko Rönkkö The Effects of Chance Correlations on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2014 .

[35]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[36]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[37]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Logistics Outsourcing Interfaces: The Role of Customer Partnering Behavior , 2012 .

[38]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[39]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Vision 20/20: Preparing today for tomorrow's challenges , 2012 .

[40]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[41]  A. M. Fet,et al.  What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development , 2013 .

[42]  Sarv Devaraj,et al.  Employee Misuse of Information Technology Resources: Testing a Contemporary Deterrence Model , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[43]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  Does Socially Responsible Supplier Selection Pay Off for Customer Firms? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison , 2013 .

[44]  Thomas J. Goldsby,et al.  On the measurement and benchmarking of research impact among active logistics scholars , 2013 .

[45]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  Using a multiple-informant approach in SCM research , 2014 .

[46]  Tom E. Yoon,et al.  A DECADE OF SCM LITERATURE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS , 2008 .

[47]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[48]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  An Exploration of Organizational Level Information Systems Discontinuance Intentions , 2011, MIS Q..

[49]  B. Jay Coleman,et al.  Benchmarking Individual Publication Productivity in Logistics , 2012 .

[50]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Statistical power in operations management research , 1995 .

[51]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[52]  Hua Song,et al.  Distribution Channel Network and Relational Performance: The Intervening Mechanism of Adaptive Distribution Flexibility , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[53]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A critical look at partial least squares modeling , 2009 .

[54]  Finn Wynstra,et al.  What did we do, who did it and did it matter? A review of fifteen volumes of the (European) Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 2010 .

[55]  S. Geisser A predictive approach to the random effect model , 1974 .

[56]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  Knowledge Sourcing Effectiveness , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[57]  J. J. Krabbendam,et al.  Uncertainty, supply risk management and their impact on performance , 2013 .

[58]  Mihalis Giannakis,et al.  The intellectual structure of the supply chain management discipline: A citation and social network analysis , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[59]  Janjaap Semeijn,et al.  Participation of suppliers in greening supply chains : An empirical analysis of German automotive suppliers , 2013 .

[60]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  How information systems help create OM capabilities: Consequents and antecedents of operational absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[61]  A. Paulraj,et al.  ACTION RESEARCH IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—A FRAMEWORK FOR RELEVANT AND RIGOROUS RESEARCH , 2010 .

[62]  Fujun Lai,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research , 2012 .

[63]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  Statistical power of structural equation models in SCM research , 2014 .

[64]  Thomas J. Kull,et al.  Evaluation criteria development and assessment of purchasing and supply management journals , 2007 .

[65]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[66]  J. Royston Some Techniques for Assessing Multivarate Normality Based on the Shapiro‐Wilk W , 1983 .

[67]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[68]  Stacie Petter,et al.  On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research , 2011, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[69]  Aron O'Cass,et al.  The effects of perceived industry competitive intensity and marketing-related capabilities: Drivers of superior brand performance , 2010 .

[70]  Philippe Jacquart,et al.  On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .

[71]  T. Dijkstra PLS' Janus Face – Response to Professor Rigdon's ‘Rethinking Partial Least Squares Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods’ , 2014 .

[72]  Michael F. Gorman,et al.  A Survey-Based Evaluation of Logistics and Transportation Research Journal Quality , 2011 .

[73]  T. Johnsen,et al.  Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels , 2012 .

[74]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[75]  Marc A. Tomiuk,et al.  A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling , 2010 .

[76]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[78]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Inter‐organizational IT use, cooperative attitude, and inter‐organizational collaboration as antecedents to contingency planning effectiveness , 2012 .

[79]  Richard Klein Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships , 2007 .

[80]  Alain De Beuckelaer,et al.  Small sample surveys: increasing rigor in supply chain management research , 2012 .

[81]  C. Harland Supply chain management research impact: An evidence-based perspective , 2013 .

[82]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[83]  Stefan Hoejmose,et al.  Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: A literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st century , 2012 .

[84]  R. F. Poist,et al.  IJPDLM's 40th anniversary: an overview and retrospective analysis , 2011 .

[85]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[86]  E. Hartmann,et al.  THE FLEXIBILITY OF LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ITS IMPACT ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2011 .

[87]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[88]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012) , 2014 .

[89]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .