论文信息 - Comment: The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Consistency With Intelligence Theory

Comment: The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Consistency With Intelligence Theory

Mayer, Caruso, and Salovey (2016) provide useful updates to the EI ability model and related concepts. However, they do not acknowledge conceptual limitations with the MSCEIT proportion scoring algorithm. In our view, failure to recognize these limitations has impeded refinements to the EI ability model and delayed support for positioning EI within the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) three-stratum theory of intelligence (Carroll, 1993). Fully appreciating algorithm-related issues justifies the reanalysis of MSCEIT data and may expand the range of metrics that are available to refine EI theory.

J. Psotka | P. Legree | Heather M. Mullins

[1] P. Salovey,et al. The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates , 2016 .

[2] Dan J. Putka,et al. Profile similarity metrics as an alternate framework to score rating-based tests: MSCEIT reanalyses. , 2014 .

[3] P. Salovey,et al. Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. , 2003, Emotion.

[4] P. Salovey,et al. Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence , 1999 .

[5] P. Salovey,et al. The intelligence of emotional intelligence , 1993 .

[6] T. Keith. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies: by John B. Canrroll. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993, ix + 819 pp., $79.95 (cloth), $29.95 (paper), computer disks (results of factor analyses) $49.95☆ , 1995 .