Limiting Factors of Automated Telephone Dialogues

If computers are to engage humans in spoken-language dialogues over the telephone, then what kinds of tasks should these systems perform? What limitations do human conversants bring to the interaction? What are the problems associated with the computer’s side of the conversation? How does the use of the telephone modality limit what can reasonably be accomplished? Finally, how are we to understand the factors that distinguish those tasks that are appropriate for implementation as automated telephone dialogues (ATDs) from those for which current technology is not yet ready, or those which will never be appropriate for ATD treatment? In this chapter, we explore the limitations imposed by the user, the system, and the telephony modality and present several perspectives for understanding interactive tasks. From these we derive a feature space of factors critical to the success of any ATD. We conclude by applying the analysis to a broader range of tasks, employing the identified features.

[1]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Toward a Plan-Based Understanding Model for Mixed-Initiative Dialogues , 1991, ACL.

[2]  David G. Novick,et al.  Systematic design of spoken prompts , 1996, CHI.

[3]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps , 1996, CHI.

[4]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[5]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[7]  D. Rutter,et al.  The timing of Looks in dyadic conversation , 1978 .

[8]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[9]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Experiments with a spoken dialogue system for taking the US census , 1997, Speech Commun..

[10]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Mixed Initiative in Dialogue: An Investigation into Discourse Segmentation , 1990, ACL.

[11]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Dialogue with machines , 1988, Cognition.

[12]  Debby Hindus,et al.  Ubiquitous audio: capturing spontaneous collaboration , 1992, CSCW '92.

[13]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  I. Altman,et al.  Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field , 1966 .

[16]  C. Sidner,et al.  Plans for Discourse , 1988 .

[17]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[18]  Ronnie W. Smith,et al.  Spoken variable initiative dialog: an adaptable natural-language interface , 1994, IEEE Expert.

[19]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  The workaday world as a paradigm for CSCW design , 1990, CSCW '90.

[20]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[21]  Elizabeth Zoltan-Ford,et al.  How to Get People to Say and Type What Computers Can Understand , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  Les E. Atlas,et al.  The challenge of spoken language systems: research directions for the nineties , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[23]  Jonathan Walpole,et al.  Enhancing the Efficiency of Multiparty Interaction Through Computer Mediation , 1990, Interact. Comput..