Pesticide Exposure during Greenhouse Applications, Part II. Chemical Permeation Through Protective Clothing in Contact with Treated Foliage

Abstract Protective clothing performance during greenhouse high pressure handspray applications was evaluated with particular reference to the hazard of contact with wet or treated foliage. A fluorescent compound was added to the applicator's spray tank prior to work and served as a surrogate for the pesticides being sprayed. Video-imaging analysis was conducted to determine deposition patterns of the fluorescent tracer on skin, and a modified patch technique was employed outside and inside the protective garment. Four garments constructed of nonwoven, chemical-resistant fabric were tested in an initial study (TyvekTM, Saranex 23-P TyvekTM, ComfortgardTM II, KleenguardTM). All garments exhibited chemical breakthrough after a 1-hour application period. Garments with special treatments to enhance chemical resistance exhibited relatively low levels of breakthrough, whereas garments without such treatment allowed substantial breakthrough. These results prompted an additional study aimed at determining the bre...

[1]  Kk Leonas,et al.  Development and Validation of a Laboratory Spray System Designed to Contaminate Fabrics with Pesticide Solutions , 1988 .

[2]  R. Fenske Correlation of fluorescent tracer measurements of dermal exposure and urinary metabolite excretion during occupational exposure to malathion. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  F Lander,et al.  Indoor application of anti-cholinesterase agents and the influence of personal protection on uptake , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[4]  Alan P. Nielsen,et al.  Protective clothing and the agricultural worker , 1986 .

[5]  H N Nigg,et al.  Pesticide exposure to greenhouse handgunners , 1989, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[6]  Data-Base Proposal for Use in Predicting Mixer-Loader-Applicator Exposure , 1985 .

[7]  R. Spear,et al.  A video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure. II. Fluorescent tracer testing. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  Krister Forsberg,et al.  Quick Selection Guide to Chemical Protective Clothing , 1993 .

[9]  R A Fenske,et al.  Nonuniform dermal deposition patterns during occupational exposure to pesticides , 1990, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[10]  R. Spear,et al.  A video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure. I. Instrument design and testing. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  Richard A. Fenske Comparative Assessment of Protective Clothing Performance by Measurement of Dermal Exposure during Pesticide Applications , 1988 .

[12]  R C Spear,et al.  Correlation of urinary pesticide metabolite excretion with estimated dermal contact in the course of occupational exposure to Guthion. , 1981, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[13]  E. Easter,et al.  Field evaluation of coverall fabrics: Heat stress and pesticide penetration , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[14]  J. E. Davis,et al.  Evaluation of various clothing materials for protection and worker acceptability during application of pesticides , 1982, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.