A Core Human Microbiome as Viewed through 16S rRNA Sequence Clusters

We explore the microbiota of 18 body sites in over 200 individuals using sequences amplified V1–V3 and the V3–V5 small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S) hypervariable regions as part of the NIH Common Fund Human Microbiome Project. The body sites with the greatest number of core OTUs, defined as OTUs shared amongst 95% or more of the individuals, were the oral sites (saliva, tongue, cheek, gums, and throat) followed by the nose, stool, and skin, while the vaginal sites had the fewest number of OTUs shared across subjects. We found that commonalities between samples based on taxonomy could sometimes belie variability at the sub-genus OTU level. This was particularly apparent in the mouth where a given genus can be present in many different oral sites, but the sub-genus OTUs show very distinct site selection, and in the vaginal sites, which are consistently dominated by the Lactobacillus genus but have distinctly different sub-genus V1–V3 OTU populations across subjects. Different body sites show approximately a ten-fold difference in estimated microbial richness, with stool samples having the highest estimated richness, followed by the mouth, throat and gums, then by the skin, nasal and vaginal sites. Richness as measured by the V1–V3 primers was consistently higher than richness measured by V3–V5. We also show that when such a large cohort is analyzed at the genus level, most subjects fit the stool “enterotype” profile, but other subjects are intermediate, blurring the distinction between the enterotypes. When analyzed at the finer-scale, OTU level, there was little or no segregation into stool enterotypes, but in the vagina distinct biotypes were apparent. Finally, we note that even OTUs present in nearly every subject, or that dominate in some samples, showed orders of magnitude variation in relative abundance emphasizing the highly variable nature across individuals.

[1]  Shital Patel,et al.  The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  Patrick D. Schloss,et al.  Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Jesse R. Zaneveld,et al.  Human-associated microbial signatures: examining their predictive value. , 2011, Cell host & microbe.

[4]  F. Bushman,et al.  Linking Long-Term Dietary Patterns with Gut Microbial Enterotypes , 2011, Science.

[5]  P. Bork,et al.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome , 2011, Nature.

[6]  Susan M. Huse,et al.  Variability and Diversity of Nasopharyngeal Microbiota in Children: A Metagenomic Analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Peer Bork,et al.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome , 2011, Nature.

[8]  John Bunge,et al.  Estimating the Number of Species with Catchall , 2011, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[9]  P. Gajer,et al.  Recent Advances in Understanding the Microbiology of the Female Reproductive Tract and the Causes of Premature Birth , 2010, Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  P. Gajer,et al.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  Bacterial Community Variation in Human Body Habitats Across Space and Time , 2009, Science.

[12]  B. Roe,et al.  A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Les Dethlefsen,et al.  The Pervasive Effects of an Antibiotic on the Human Gut Microbiota, as Revealed by Deep 16S rRNA Sequencing , 2008, PLoS biology.

[14]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  R. Ley,et al.  Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine , 2006, Cell.