Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality.

Diffuse pollution from agriculture remains a significant challenge to many countries seeking to improve and protect their water environments. This paper reviews literature relating to the provision of information and advice as a mechanism to encourage farmers to mitigate diffuse pollution. The paper presents findings from a literature review on influencing farmer behaviour and synthesizes three main areas of literature: psychological and institutional theories of behaviour; shifts in the approach to delivery of advice (from knowledge transfer to knowledge exchange); and the increased interest in heterogeneous farming cultures. These three areas interconnect in helping to understand how best to influence farmer behaviour in order to mitigate diffuse pollution. They are, however, literatures that are rarely cited in the water management arena. The paper highlights the contribution of the 'cultural turn' taken by rural social scientists in helping to understand collective and individual voluntary behaviour. The paper explores how these literatures can contribute to the existing understanding of water management in the agricultural context, particularly: when farmers question the scientific evidence; when there are increased calls for collaborative planning and management; and when there is increased value placed on information as a business commodity. The paper also highlights where there are still gaps in knowledge that need to be filled by future research - possibly in partnership with farmers themselves. Whilst information and advice has long been seen as an important part of diffuse pollution control, increasing climate variability that will require farmers to practice adaptive management is likely to make these mechanisms even more important.

[1]  D. Roush Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[2]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes , 2008 .

[3]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Farmer rationality and the adoption of environmentally sound practices; A critique of the assumptions of traditional agricultural extension , 1994 .

[4]  G. Robinson Ontario’s Environmental Farm Plan: Evaluation and research agenda , 2006 .

[5]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[6]  R. Kreutzwiser,et al.  Imagined Communities, Contested Watersheds: Challenges to Integrated Water Resources Management in Agricultural Areas. , 2008 .

[7]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[8]  A. Black,et al.  Extension theory and practice: a review , 2000 .

[9]  K. Morgan,et al.  Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain 1 1 This pap , 2000 .

[10]  Frederick L. Kirschenmann,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. , 2001 .

[11]  Catherine Allan,et al.  Can adaptive management help us embrace the Murray-Darling Basin’s wicked problems? , 2008 .

[12]  Paul J. A. Withers,et al.  PSYCHIC – A process-based model of phosphorus and sediment mobilisation and delivery within agricultural catchments. Part 1: Model description and parameterisation , 2008 .

[13]  B. Bates,et al.  Climate change and water: technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 2008 .

[14]  Christopher J A Macleod,et al.  Integration for sustainable catchment management. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Adaptive and integrated water management , 2008 .

[16]  A. Louise Heathwaite,et al.  Making process-based knowledge useable at the operational level: a framework for modelling diffuse pollution from agricultural land , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Romy Greiner,et al.  Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers , 2009 .

[18]  J. Mccarthy Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies - reactionary or radical? , 2005 .

[19]  H. Ayer GRASS ROOTS COLLECTIVE ACTION: AGRICULTURAL OPPORTUNITIES , 1997 .

[20]  Graham Jewitt,et al.  Building an understanding of water use innovation adoption processes through farmer-driven experimentation , 2008 .

[21]  J. Quinn,et al.  Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use of computer-based support tools in policy relevant research , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Paul G. H. Engel,et al.  The Social Organization of Innovation: A Focus on Stakeholder Interaction , 1997 .

[24]  N. Ward,et al.  Shifting values in agriculture: the farm family and pollution regulation1☆ , 1994 .

[25]  F. Buttel Some Reflections on Late Twentieth Century Agrarian Political Economy , 2001 .

[26]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[27]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in Scotland: the view from the farm , 2006 .

[28]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[29]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Styles of Farming and FarmingSubcultures: Appropriate conceptsfor Australian rural sociology? , 1998 .

[30]  R. Sonnino,et al.  Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK , 2008 .

[31]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Theories of attitude change , 1967 .

[32]  G. Keith Warriner,et al.  Kinship and personal communication network influences on the adoption of agriculture conservation technology , 1992 .

[33]  Chris Garforth,et al.  Fragmentation or creative diversity? Options in the provision of land management advisory services , 2003 .

[34]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[35]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[36]  M. Rivington,et al.  Characterising the agro-meteorological implications of climate change scenarios for land management stakeholders , 2008 .

[37]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins , 2007 .

[38]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective , 2004 .

[39]  C. Morris,et al.  Agricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect , 2004 .

[40]  A. Pacey,et al.  Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research , 1989 .

[41]  M. Flindt,et al.  Modelling nutrient mass balance in a temperate meso-tidal estuary: Implications for management , 2008 .

[42]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[43]  Robert Fish,et al.  A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters. , 2009 .

[44]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  Styles of farming: an introductory note on concepts and methodology. , 1994 .

[45]  Caspar J. M. Hewett,et al.  Agricultural land use and flood risk management: Engaging with stakeholders in North Yorkshire , 2008 .

[46]  T. Marsden Constructing The Countryside , 1993 .

[47]  Bruce Mitchell,et al.  Integrated Water Resource Management, Institutional Arrangements, and Land-Use Planning , 2005 .

[48]  Michael S. Carolan,et al.  Sustainable agriculture, science and the co-production of ‘expert’ knowledge: The value of interactional expertise , 2006 .

[49]  J. Pretty Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources , 2003, Science.

[50]  D. Gibbon,et al.  Evaluation of key factors that lead to successful agri-environmental co-operative schemes. , 2008 .

[51]  R. Burton Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer's’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour , 2004 .

[52]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions , 2002 .

[53]  B. Bates,et al.  Climate change and water. , 2008 .

[54]  Barbara van Koppen,et al.  Entrenched views or insufficient science? Contested causes and solutions of water allocation; insights from the Great Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania , 2004 .

[55]  J. Gowdy Behavioral economics and climate change policy , 2008 .

[56]  A. Curtis,et al.  The role of Landcare group networks in rural Australia: exploring the contribution of social capital , 2001 .

[57]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  RURAL SOCIOLOGY AND THE NEW AGRARIAN QUESTION A Perspective from the Netherlands , 1993 .

[58]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. , 2000 .

[59]  P. Sabatier Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[60]  Craig Johnson,et al.  Uncommon Ground: The ‘Poverty of History’ in Common Property Discourse , 2004 .

[61]  J. Lubchenco Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[62]  T. Rehman,et al.  Application and impact of the Single Payment Scheme: a theory of planned behaviour analysis (Defra Research Project EPES 0405/17: research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers in responding to policy changes (England)) , 2006 .

[63]  T. Marsden Constructing The Countryside , 1993 .

[64]  B. Hill Farm incomes, wealth, and agricultural policy , 1989 .

[65]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[66]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development , 1994 .

[67]  R. Burton An Alternative to Farmer Age as an Indicator of Life-Cycle Stage: The Case for a Farm Family Age Index. , 2006 .

[68]  R. Gasson,et al.  The economics of part-time farming , 1989 .