An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas

Abstract In the context of sustainable densification of post-industrial European cities, regeneration of disused urban areas offer an important potential of surfaces to recapture. Indeed, these projects can contribute concurrently to densify and revitalize existing built fabrics. Although numerous initiatives of this type can be observed, the integration of sustainability issues is in most cases partial or superficial. As a matter of fact, achieving the goals of sustainable development is not a spontaneous process. It depends upon a proactive search of global quality, integrated into the project dynamics, and a continuous assessment of the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability adapted to the specificities of such projects. Based on these considerations, this paper introduces the indicator system entitled SIPRIUS, designed for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. First, the methodology that stands behind the development of SIPRIUS is exposed. Then, the paper presents the potential of SIPRIUS and its adequacy with concrete situations through a test application performed on a project underway in Neuchâtel (Switzerland). It reveals that an adapted and structured assessment approach truly contributes to integrating sustainability into regeneration of disused urban areas. Furthermore, future work will include the adaptation of SIPRIUS into a digital monitoring tool in order to make it accessible to key stakeholders involved in this type of operations.

[1]  T. Dixon Integrating Sustainability into Brownfield Regeneration: Rhetoric or Reality? – An Analysis of the UK Development Industry , 2006 .

[2]  Emmanuel Rey The Ecoparc project in Neuchâtel : sustainable regeneration of an urban wasteland , 2002 .

[3]  Lauren Andres,et al.  Ville durable, ville mutable: quelle convergence en France et en suisse ? , 2010 .

[4]  Justin B. Hollander,et al.  Principles of Brownfield Regeneration: Cleanup, Design, and Reuse of Derelict Land , 2010 .

[5]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Creative intervention in a dynamic city: A sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany , 2011 .

[6]  Akito Murayama,et al.  Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan , 2014 .

[7]  Joe Doak,et al.  Actor Networks: The Brownfield Merry‐Go‐Round , 2008 .

[8]  K. Pediaditi,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects : the Redevelopment Assessment Framework (RAF) , 2005 .

[9]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools , 2013 .

[10]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Development of an indicator model and ranking of sustainable revitalization alternatives of derelict property: a Lithuanian case study , 2006 .

[11]  Aleksandra Koj,et al.  Sustainable development and brownfield regeneration. What defines the quality of derelict land recycling? , 2006 .

[12]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Brownfield Development: Tools for Stewardship , 2004 .

[13]  Andrea Colantonio,et al.  Urban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities , 2010 .

[14]  Philip Catney,et al.  Sustainable brownfield regeneration: liveable places from problem spaces , 2007 .

[15]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  Integration of Sustainability Issues into the Regeneration of Urban Wasteland: From Theoretical Framework to Operational Monitoring Tool , 2014 .

[16]  Francis K.W. Wong,et al.  Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[17]  S Schädler,et al.  Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Katie Williams,et al.  A framework for assessing the sustainability of brownfield developments , 2007 .

[19]  Kalliope Pediaditi,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield, regeneration to greenspace initiatives: A meta-evaluation of assessment and monitoring tools , 2010 .

[20]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[21]  K. Williams,et al.  Sustainable Land Reuse: The Influence of Different Stakeholders in Achieving Sustainable Brownfield Developments in England , 2006 .

[22]  David Ludlow,et al.  European common indicators: Towards a local sustainability profile , 2003 .

[23]  Maria Chrysochoou,et al.  A GIS and indexing scheme to screen brownfields for area-wide redevelopment planning , 2012 .

[24]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  Des friches urbaines aux quartiers durables , 2007 .

[25]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  The influence of centrality on the global energy consumption in Swiss neighborhoods , 2013 .

[26]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Addressing sustainability early in the urban design process , 2006 .

[27]  R. Rogers Cities For A Small Planet , 1997 .

[28]  Emmanuel Rey Régénération des friches urbaines et développement durable : vers une évaluation intégrée à la dynamique du projet , 2009 .

[29]  Gerhard Petschel-Held,et al.  Urban sprawl in Europe : landscapes, land-use change & policy , 2007 .

[30]  Morten Elle,et al.  Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: From the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development , 2010 .

[31]  M. Jenks,et al.  The Compact City : A Sustainable Urban Form? , 1996 .

[32]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Clean It and They Will Come? Defining Successful Brownfield Development , 2004 .

[33]  M. G. Pérez,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to compare urban renewal scenarios for an existing neighborhood. Case study in Lausanne (Switzerland) , 2013 .

[34]  Douglas Crawford-Brown,et al.  Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Brian W. Baetz,et al.  A prototype community-based planning tool for evaluating site suitability for the temporary reuse of vacant lands , 2014 .

[36]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives , 2007 .