The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes

Although the relation between firm size and innovation has been much studied in the literature, theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence remain inconclusive. This paper proposes a contingent approach where the prevailing technological regime of each firm impacts on the relation between size and RD the effects of firm size on R&D productivity are then analyzed for each of the identified regimes. The results show that the relation between firm size and innovation depends on the technological regime. Smaller firms are favored by regimes characterized by the proximity to the science system, the use of intellectual property rights as a means of appropriation, or by low knowledge cumulativeness. Meanwhile, the innovation performance of larger firms is comparatively better in regimes with limited use of intellectual property rights and where the relationships with clients and suppliers are important sources of opportunities for innovation.

[1]  T. Klette,et al.  Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-so-Fixed Effect Model , 1998 .

[2]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[4]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific , 1996 .

[5]  Luc Soete,et al.  Innovation and size of firm , 2013 .

[6]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[7]  Mario Pianta,et al.  Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing , 2008 .

[8]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[9]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[10]  F. Bogliacino,et al.  Engines of growth. Innovation and productivity in industry groups , 2011 .

[11]  Gerald Marschke,et al.  Relation of Firm Size to R&D Productivity , 2009 .

[12]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector , 1998 .

[13]  A. Leiponen,et al.  What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities , 2007 .

[14]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .

[15]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .

[16]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[17]  María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina,et al.  Process innovations and firm productivity growth , 2010 .

[18]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry , 1993 .

[19]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[20]  Wesley M. Cohen.  Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance , 2010 .

[21]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[22]  O. Marsili,et al.  Technological Regimes and Sources of Entrepreneurship , 2000 .

[23]  F. Malerba,et al.  Exploring factors affecting international technological specialization: the role of knowledge flows and the structure of innovative activity , 2003 .

[24]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  R&D Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[25]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  The R&D Performance in Taiwan's Electronics Industry: A Longitudinal Examination , 2004 .

[26]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale and scope in drug development: unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[27]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy , 2006 .

[28]  Xulia González,et al.  Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? , 2008 .

[29]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[30]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Firm Size, University Based Research, and the Returns to R&D , 1990 .

[31]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas.  Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants , 2006 .

[32]  Gongming Qian,et al.  Profitability of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry , 2003 .

[33]  M. Rogers.  R&D and productivity: using UK firm-level data to inform policy , 2010 .

[34]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[35]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Firm Bebavior , 1993 .

[36]  Ira Horowitz,et al.  Firm Size and Research Activity , 1962 .

[37]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Impact of R&D Investment on Productivity - New Evidence Using Linked R&D-Lrd Data , 1989 .

[38]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[39]  Jakob B. Madsen.  Are there diminishing returns to R&D? , 2007 .

[40]  W. Velicer,et al.  Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. , 1998 .

[41]  Ljiljana Božić,et al.  The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy , 2009 .

[42]  William M. Cready,et al.  Scale Effects of R&D as Reflected in Earnings and Returns , 2011 .

[43]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[44]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Building Flexible Organizations for Fast-moving Markets , 1997 .

[45]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[46]  Kuen‐Hung Tsai.  R&D productivity and firm size: a nonlinear examination , 2005 .

[47]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[48]  O. Williamson.  / STRATEGIZING, ECONOMIZING, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[49]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[50]  Mingfang Li,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM, CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL TEST , 2002 .

[51]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[52]  Keun Lee,et al.  Sectoral systems of innovation and productivity catch-up: determinants of the productivity gap between Korean and Japanese firms , 2010 .

[53]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[54]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[55]  L. Raymond,et al.  R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification , 2010 .

[56]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[57]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[58]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Pavitt'S Taxonomy Sixteen Years On: A Review Article , 2001 .

[59]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2008 .

[60]  Kyoo-Ho Park,et al.  Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data , 2006 .

[61]  M. Rogers.  Networks, Firm Size and Innovation , 2004 .

[62]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Small firms and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy , 1994 .

[63]  C. Syverson.  What Determines Productivity? , 2010 .

[64]  M. Nieto,et al.  Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms** , 2010 .

[65]  C. Edquist.  Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries , 2013 .

[66]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[67]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[68]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[69]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[70]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm level productivity growth , 2010 .

[71]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[72]  F. Castellacci.  Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation , 2008 .

[73]  Elizabeth J. Jensen.  Research Expenditures and the Discovery of New Drugs , 1987 .

[74]  M. Peneder.  Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors , 2010 .

[75]  D. Hamberg,et al.  Size of Firm, Oligopoly, and Research: The Evidence * , 1964 .

[76]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[77]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Innovation and Size of Finn , 1995 .

[78]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  Does R&D performance decline with firm size?—A re-examination in terms of elasticity , 2005 .

[79]  Stephen Bond,et al.  GMM Estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions , 1999 .

[80]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth , 2007 .

[81]  M. Kafouros.  Economic returns to industrial research , 2008 .

[82]  Marco Vivarelli,et al.  R&D and productivity: testing sectoral peculiarities using micro data , 2009 .

[83]  Francesca Lotti,et al.  Innovation and Productivity in SMEs - Empirical Evidence for Italy , 2009 .

[84]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? , 1986 .

[85]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[86]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation , 2002 .

[87]  Mariacristina Piva,et al.  Is Corporate R&D Investment in High-Tech Sectors More Effective? , 2009 .

[88]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[89]  Mikel Buesa,et al.  Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region , 1996 .

[90]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .