A quantitative analysis of the relationship between an online homework system and student achievement in pre-calculus

Supporting student success in entry-level mathematics courses at the undergraduate level has and continues to be a challenge. Recently we have seen an increased reliance on technological supports including software to supplement more traditional in-class instruction. In this paper, we explore the effects on student performance of the use of a computer software program to supplement instruction in an entry-level mathematics course at the undergraduate level, specifically, a pre-calculus course. Relying on data from multiple sections of the course over various semesters, we compare student performance in those classes utilizing the software against those in which it was not used. Quantitative analysis of the data then leads us to conclusions about the effectiveness of the software as well as recommendations for future iterations of the course and others like it.

[1]  C. A. Twigg,et al.  Innovations in online learning: Moving beyond no significant difference , 2001 .

[2]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[3]  W. Chu,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Microcrack Healing in Copper , 2001 .

[4]  Sepideh Stewart,et al.  Towards student instrumentation of computer-based algebra systems in university courses , 2005 .

[5]  Sue Betka,et al.  National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance , 2015 .

[6]  David Leigh-Lancaster.  Curriculum and Assessment Congruence--Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) in Victoria , 2000 .

[7]  Ryan J. Zerr,et al.  A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of online homework in first-semester calculus , 2007 .

[8]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Reflections on the Changing Pedagogical use of Computer Algebra Systems: Assistance for Doing or Le , 2001 .

[9]  Kimberly Jordan Burch,et al.  Traditional vs. Online Homework in College Algebra , 2010 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes , 2001, CHI.

[11]  Joseph Hilbe.  Hawkes Learning Systems , 2008 .

[12]  Steven Ritter,et al.  What Evidence Matters? A randomized field trial of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I , 2007, ICCE.

[13]  David Wallace,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom Teaching , 1997 .

[14]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Student reflections on formative e‐assessment: expectations and perceptions , 2008 .

[15]  Catherine Maltbie,et al.  Student Performance and Acceptance of Instructional Technology: Comparing Technology‐Enhanced and Traditional Instruction for a Course in Statics , 2003 .

[16]  James A. Middleton,et al.  Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research , 1999 .

[17]  Carl Lee,et al.  Introductory statistics, college student attitudes and knowledge – a qualitative analysis of the impact of technology-based instruction , 2007 .