Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel In three experiments, we examined the effects of prime-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and the proportion of related primes and targets (relatedness proportion, or RP) on semantic priming when the prime was either named or was searched for a specific letter. In Experiment 1, with an RP of. 50, priming occurred at SOAs of 240 and 840 msec when the prime was named, but no priming was found at either SOA when the prime was searched for a letter. In Experiment 2 the RP was either. 20 or. 80, and the SOA was set at 1, 700 msec; priming again was found in both conditions when the prime was named, but only in the RP.80 condition when a letter search task was performed on the prime. In Experiment 3, both the proportion of related trials and SOA were varied; as in the previous experiments, no priming effects were found with the letter search task for either SOA in the RP.20 condition, but the priming effect was reinstated in the RP.80 condition. These results are discussed with respect to how limited capacity resources are allocated and how they influence semantic priming effects.

[1]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[2]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[3]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[4]  James R. Tweedy,et al.  Facilitating Word Recognition: Evidence for Strategic and Automatic Factors , 1981 .

[5]  G D Logan,et al.  On the autonomy of mental processes: a case study of arithmetic. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Ira Fischler,et al.  Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. , 1977 .

[8]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[9]  D E Meyer,et al.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. , 1976, Science.

[10]  Joan E. Regan,et al.  Automaticity and learning: Effects of familiarity on naming letters. , 1981 .

[11]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Kahneman.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[14]  S. Greenberg,et al.  Evidence for processing of constituent singleand multiletter codes: Support for multilevel coding in word perception , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[15]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Levels and speed of processing effects on word analysis , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[17]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[18]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .

[19]  Gary L. Dannenbring,et al.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[20]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[21]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. , 1981 .

[22]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[23]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Reduction of semantic priming from inclusion of physically or nominally related prime-target pairs , 1987 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task. , 1986, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[25]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[27]  Derek Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: A dissociation of lexical and semantic processing. , 1990, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  A. Koriat,et al.  Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[30]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[31]  M. C. Smith,et al.  The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  W. Johnston,et al.  In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception. , 1989 .