The effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification

This work verifies whether research diversification by a scientist is in some measure related to their collaboration with multidisciplinary teams. The analysis considers the publications achieved by 5300 Italian academics in the sciences over the period 2004–2008. The findings show that a scientist’s outputs resulting from research diversification are more often than not the result of collaborations with multidisciplinary teams. The effect becomes more pronounced with larger and particularly with more diversified teams. This phenomenon is observed both at the overall level and for the disciplinary macro-areas.

[1]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: A field level analysis , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Myra H. Strober,et al.  Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement , 2006 .

[3]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification , 2018, Scientometrics.

[4]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research diversification behavior , 2017, ISSI.

[5]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  How do you define and measure research productivity? , 2014, Scientometrics.

[6]  F. Darbellay.  Rethinking inter- and transdisciplinarity: Undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of a new thought style , 2015 .

[7]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The effects of multiple team membership on networking online and offline: using multilevel multiple membership modeling , 2016 .

[8]  G. Mo.  Examining cross-disciplinary communication's impact on multidisciplinary collaborations: implications for innovations , 2016 .

[9]  Myong Kee Jeong,et al.  Two-phase edge outlier detection method for technology opportunity discovery , 2017, Scientometrics.

[10]  Benjamin Y. Clark,et al.  Investments in Scientific Research: Examining the Funding Threshold Effects on Scientific Collaborat , 2012 .

[11]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Publication Rates in 192 Research Fields of the Hard Sciences , 2015, ISSI.

[12]  Cristiano Giuffrida,et al.  A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  J. Klein.  Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  Junji Nakano,et al.  An International Research Comparative Study of the Degree of Cooperation between disciplines within mathematics and mathematical sciences: proposal and application of new indices for identifying the specialized field of researchers , 2017 .

[15]  K. B. Wray,et al.  Rethinking Scientific Specialization , 2005, Social studies of science.

[16]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[18]  W. Shrum,et al.  Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country , 2011 .

[19]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[20]  M. Adelman,et al.  Comment on the "H" Concentration Measure as a Numbers-Equivalent , 1969 .

[21]  M. Clark,et al.  Evaluating transdisciplinary science. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[22]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university , 2009 .

[23]  Why interdisciplinary research matters , 2015, Nature.

[24]  P. Weingart.  2. Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxical Discourse , 2000 .

[25]  Jun Suzuki,et al.  Promoting scientodiversity inspired by biodiversity , 2017, Scientometrics.

[26]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[27]  Yin Leng Theng,et al.  Exploring prestigious citations sourced from top universities in bibliometrics and altmetrics: a case study in the computer science discipline , 2017, Scientometrics.

[28]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[29]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[30]  Ana Viseu,et al.  Integration of social science into research is crucial , 2015, Nature.

[31]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[32]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output , 2019, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Does your surname affect the citability of your publications? , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[34]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science? , 2017, Scientometrics.

[35]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[36]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: which strategy pays off? , 2019, Technovation.

[37]  Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka,et al.  Bibliometric indicators of interdisciplinarity: the potential of the Leinster–Cobbold diversity indices to study disciplinary diversity , 2016, Scientometrics.