TESTING THE POTENTIAL OF VEGETATION INDICES FOR LAND USE/COVER CLASSIFICATION USING HIGH RESOLUTION DATA

Abstract. Accurate and reliable land use/land cover (LULC) information obtained by remote sensing technology is necessary in many applications such as environmental monitoring, agricultural management, urban planning, hydrological applications, soil management, vegetation condition study and suitability analysis. But this information still remains a challenge especially in heterogeneous landscapes covering urban and rural areas due to spectrally similar LULC features. In parallel with technological developments, supplementary data such as satellite-derived spectral indices have begun to be used as additional bands in classification to produce data with high accuracy. The aim of this research is to test the potential of spectral vegetation indices combination with supervised classification methods and to extract reliable LULC information from SPOT 7 multispectral imagery. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Ratio Vegetation Index (RATIO), the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) were the three vegetation indices used in this study. The classical maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithm were applied to classify SPOT 7 image. Catalca is selected region located in the north west of the Istanbul in Turkey, which has complex landscape covering artificial surface, forest and natural area, agricultural field, quarry/mining area, pasture/scrubland and water body. Accuracy assessment of all classified images was performed through overall accuracy and kappa coefficient. The results indicated that the incorporation of these three different vegetation indices decrease the classification accuracy for the MLC and SVM classification. In addition, the maximum likelihood classification slightly outperformed the support vector machine classification approach in both overall accuracy and kappa statistics.

[1]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[2]  B. Mihai,et al.  Mapping Land Cover Using Remote Sensing Data and GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Prahova Subcarpathians , 2016 .

[3]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[4]  Guiying Li,et al.  Methods to extract impervious surface areas from satellite images , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[5]  C. Ikiel,et al.  LAND USE AND LAND COVER (LULC) CLASSIFICATION USING SPOT-5 IMAGE IN THE ADAPAZARI PLAIN AND ITS SURROUNDINGS,TURKEY , 2012 .

[6]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends , 2012 .

[7]  I MohdHasmadi,et al.  Evaluating supervised and unsupervised techniques for land cover mapping using remote sensing data , 2009 .

[8]  J. Kashaigili,et al.  Usage of indices for extraction of built-up areas and vegetation features from landsat TM image: a case of Dar es Salaam and Kisarawe peri-urban areas, Tanzania , 2013 .

[9]  Nektarios Chrysoulakis,et al.  Landsat 8 vs. Landsat 5: A comparison based on urban and peri-urban land cover mapping , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[10]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[11]  John R. Jensen Introductory Digital Image Processing , 2004 .

[12]  M. Ustuner,et al.  Testing the Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Crop Type Classification Using Rapideye Imagery , 2015 .

[13]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Parameterizing Support Vector Machines for Land Cover Classification , 2011 .

[14]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Land Cover Mapping from Remote Sensor Imagery , 2015 .

[15]  Jordi Cristóbal,et al.  Enhanced land use/cover classification of heterogeneous tropical landscapes using support vector machines and textural homogeneity , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[16]  P. Thongchumnum,et al.  Comparison of vegetation indices for mangrove mapping using THEOS data , 2013 .

[17]  Xiaoguang Jiang,et al.  Comparison of artificial neural networks and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification in Northern China using a SPOT-5 HRG image , 2012 .

[18]  V. Desai,et al.  Land Use / Land Cover Classification of Remote Sensing Data and Their Derived Products in a Heterogeneous Landscape of a Khan-Kali Watershed , Gujarat , 2015 .

[19]  V. Desai,et al.  Post-classification corrections in improving the classification of Land Use/Land Cover of arid region using RS and GIS: The case of Arjuni watershed, Gujarat, India , 2017 .

[20]  Xiaobo Luo,et al.  Study on Urban Remote Sensing Classification Based on Improved RBF Network and Normalized Difference Indexes , 2015 .

[21]  A. Viña,et al.  Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops , 2011 .