Translation and articulation in biological motion perception.

Recent models of biological motion processing focus on the articulational aspect of human walking investigated by point-light figures walking in place. However, in real human walking, the change in the position of the limbs relative to each other (referred to as articulation) results in a change of body location in space over time (referred to as translation). In order to examine the role of this translational component on the perception of biological motion we designed three psychophysical experiments of facing (leftward/rightward) and articulation discrimination (forward/backward and leftward/rightward) of a point-light walker viewed from the side, varying translation direction (relative to articulation direction), the amount of local image motion, and trial duration. In a further set of a forward/backward and a leftward/rightward articulation task, we additionally tested the influence of translational speed, including catch trials without articulation. We found a perceptual bias in translation direction in all three discrimination tasks. In the case of facing discrimination the bias was limited to short stimulus presentation. Our results suggest an interaction of articulation analysis with the processing of translational motion leading to best articulation discrimination when translational direction and speed match articulation. Moreover, we conclude that the global motion of the center-of-mass of the dot pattern is more relevant to processing of translation than the local motion of the dots. Our findings highlight that translation is a relevant cue that should be integrated in models of human motion detection.

[1]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[2]  C. P. Benton,et al.  Form overshadows ‘opponent motion’ information in processing of biological motion from point light walker stimuli , 2010, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Burr,et al.  Seeing objects in motion , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Adaptation to biological motion leads to a motion and a form aftereffect , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms for Coding of Visual Actions in Macaque Temporal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Local-to-global form interference in biological motion perception , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure from Motion of Rigid and Jointed Objects , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[13]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[14]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Action Recognition by Motion Detection in Posture Space , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Vogels,et al.  Functional differentiation of macaque visual temporal cortical neurons using a parametric action space. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate Face and Body Selectivity on the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[19]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[22]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  Structural processing in biological motion perception. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[26]  J. Lange,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[27]  W. Reichardt Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[28]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Contribution of configural information in a direction discrimination task: Evidence using a novel masking paradigm , 2009, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Lange,et al.  A Model of Biological Motion Perception from Configural Form Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[31]  D. Sheinberg,et al.  Temporal Cortex Neurons Encode Articulated Actions as Slow Sequences of Integrated Poses , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Edouard Gentaz,et al.  Preference for point-light human biological motion in newborns: contribution of translational displacement. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[33]  Aina Puce,et al.  Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Russell Reid,et al.  Snap! Recognising Implicit Actions in Static Point-Light Displays , 2009, Perception.

[35]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[36]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Physical and Biological Constraints Govern Perceived Animacy of Scrambled Human Forms , 2013, Psychological science.

[38]  M. Lappe,et al.  Visual areas involved in the perception of human movement from dynamic form analysis , 2005, Neuroreport.

[39]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[41]  J. Cutting Coding Theory Adapted to Gait Perception , 1981 .

[42]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[43]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Yang Song,et al.  A computational model for motion detection and direction discrimination in humans , 2000, Proceedings Workshop on Human Motion.

[45]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.