Key rheological properties of hyaluronic acid fillers: from tissue integration to product degradation

Aim: Over the last 15 years, hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have become the most popular injectable biomaterial for soft tissue correction. With the increasing number of available HA fillers and the multiplication of facial treatments all over the world, there has been a need from physicians to better understand the HA fillers science. There is especially a growing interest in the science-based evaluation of rheological characteristics which represents an essential tool to guide physicians in the selection of the most appropriate HA fillers, administration techniques and depths of injection for their clinical applications. Methods: Four key rheological parameters (viscosity η, elasticity G’, normal force FN and elasticity E’) are measured and discussed on five HA fillers. Results: These four key rheological parameters are demonstrated to play a pivotal role, in combination with the cohesivity, for better predicting the clinical behavior of HA fillers at different stages of their lifetime. Conclusion: This article discusses the importance of four key rheological parameters during the main steps of the clinical HA fillers’ lifetime, from the product injection to the loss of clinical effects. A better knowledge of these HA fillers’ rheological parameters can help the physicians to optimize their aesthetic outcomes, safety and patient satisfaction.

[1]  P. Quinodoz,et al.  Ultrasound and Histologic Examination after Subcutaneous Injection of Two Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Preliminary Study , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[2]  C. Lepage,et al.  [Benefits of volumetric to facial rejuvenation. Part 2: Dermal fillers]. , 2017, Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique.

[3]  B. Hersant,et al.  [Hyaluronic acid rheology: Basics and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation]. , 2017, Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique.

[4]  M. Dadras,et al.  Influence of the Macro- and/or Microstructure of Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels on the Release of Two Model Drugs , 2016 .

[5]  K. Mondon,et al.  Key importance of compression properties in the biophysical characteristics of hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[6]  D. Salomon,et al.  Effect of Different Crosslinking Technologies on Hyaluronic Acid Behavior: A Visual and Microscopic Study of Seven Hyaluronic Acid Gels. , 2016, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[7]  S. Fagien,et al.  Cohesive Polydensified Matrix Hyaluronic Acid for Fine Lines , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Cohesivity of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Development and Clinical Implications of a Novel Assay, Pilot Validation with a Five-Point Grading Scale, and Evaluation of Six U.S. Food and Drug Administration–Approved Fillers , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  S. Liew,et al.  Basics of Dermal Filler Rheology , 2015, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[10]  D. Salomon,et al.  In vivo Bio-Integration of Three Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Human Skin: A Histological Study , 2013, Dermatology.

[11]  D. Cassuto,et al.  Biophysical Characteristics of Hyaluronic Acid Soft-Tissue Fillers and Their Relevance to Aesthetic Applications , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  T. Flynn,et al.  A Blanching Technique for Intradermal Injection of the Hyaluronic Acid Belotero , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  Marina Romagnoli,et al.  Hyaluronic acid-based fillers: theory and practice. , 2008, Clinics in dermatology.

[14]  M. J. Jedrzejas,et al.  The many ways to cleave hyaluronan. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.