Influence of dry-rolling and tempering agent addition during the steam-flaking of sorghum grain on its feeding value for feedlot cattle.

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of dry-rolling (DRS) and tempering agent (TA) addition during the steam-flaking of grain sorghum (SFS) for feedlot cattle. Five dietary treatments were compared: 1) DRS; 2) SFS, no TA; 3) SFS, 0.275 mg/kg of TA; 4) SFS, 1.375 mg/kg of TA; and 5) SFS, 2.750 mg/kg of TA. Bulk densities of DRS and SFS were 0.48 and 0.36 kg/L, respectively. Diets contained 70.6% grain sorghum (DM basis). One hundred fifty crossbred steers (336 kg of BW) were used in a 115-d finishing experiment to evaluate treatment effects on feedlot performance. Body weight gain averaged 1.49 kg/d and was not affected (P = 0.47) by treatments. The SFS reduced (P < 0.01) DMI (9%) and enhanced (P < 0.01) G:F (13%) and the NE(m) and NE(g) value of the diet (9 and 11%, respectively). Use of a TA before flaking sorghum did not influence (P > 0.20) cattle growth performance or NE(m) or NE(g) value of the diet. Given that the NE(m) and NE(g) values of DRS are 2.00 and 1.35 Mcal/kg, respectively (NRC, 1996), the corresponding values for SFS were 2.28 and 1.59 Mcal/kg. Five steers (397 kg of BW) with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square design to evaluate treatment effects on digestive function. Ruminal digestion of OM and starch was greater (14 and 16%, respectively; P < 0.01) for SFS vs. DRS. Steam-flaking sorghum increased (P < 0.01) postruminal digestion of OM (11%), N (10%), and starch (25%) and total tract digestion (P < 0.01) of OM (8.3%), N (8.2%), and starch (8.9%). Grain processing did not affect (P > 0.20) ruminal pH or VFA molar proportions. There was a cubic component (P < 0.10) to level of TA on ruminal pH and VFA molar proportions, with values being optimal at 1.375 mg/kg of tempering agent. It is concluded that steam-flaking grain sorghum will increase its NE value for maintenance and gain (14 and 18%, respectively) and enhance the MP value of the diet due to greater intestinal N digestion. The use of a TA to enhance the mechanical efficiency of the flaking process may not otherwise benefit the feeding value of sorghum.

[1]  M. Galyean,et al.  Effect of Mixing Whole Shelled and Steam Flaked Corn in Finishing Diets on Feedlot Performance and Site and Extent of Digestion in Beef Steers , 1982 .

[2]  R. Zinn,et al.  Interaction of feed intake level on comparative ruminal and total tract digestion of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[3]  M. Poore,et al.  Flake density of steam-processed sorghum grain alters performance and sites of digestibility by growing-finishing steers. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[4]  C. Ireland Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments , 1964 .

[5]  F. Owens,et al.  A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR PURINE MEASUREMENT AND ITS USE FOR ESTIMATING NET RUMINAL PROTEIN SYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[6]  M. Wolin A Theoretical Rumen Fermentation Balance , 1960 .

[7]  R. Zinn Influence of flake density on the comparative feeding value of steam-flaked corn for feedlot cattle. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Zinn Influence of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin on comparative feeding value of steam-flaked versus dry-rolled corn in diets for feedlot cattle. , 1987, Journal of animal science.

[9]  R. Zinn Comparative feeding value of steam-flaked corn and sorghum in finishing diets supplemented with or without sodium bicarbonate. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[10]  R. Zinn,et al.  The feeding value of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn in finishing diets for feedlot cattle: influence of protein supplementation. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  Influence of steam-flaked corn moisture level and density on the site and extent of digestibility and feeding value for finishing cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[12]  L. Rooney,et al.  Effect of Conditioning Agents on the Structure of Tempered and Steam-Flaked Sorghum , 1998 .

[13]  L. Rooney,et al.  Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[14]  Y. Wang,et al.  Effects of moisture, roller setting, and saponin-based surfactant on barley processing, ruminal degradation of barley, and growth performance by feedlot steers. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[15]  R. Zinn,et al.  Interaction of whole cottonseed and supplemental fat on digestive function in cattle. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[16]  F. Owens,et al.  Starch digestion by feedlot cattle: predictions from analysis of feed and fecal starch and nitrogen. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[17]  R. Bull,et al.  Effects of barley variety and processing methods on feedlot steer performance and carcass characteristics. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[18]  F. Owens,et al.  Flaking corn: processing mechanics, quality standards, and impacts on energy availability and performance of feedlot cattle. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[19]  G. P. Lofgreen,et al.  A system for expressing net energy requirements and feed values for growing and finishing beef cattle. , 1968 .

[20]  R. Zinn,et al.  Steam-processed corn and sorghum grain flaked at different densities alter ruminal, small intestinal, and total tract digestibility of starch by steers. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[21]  F. Hill,et al.  Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. , 1958, The Journal of nutrition.

[22]  W. Bergen,et al.  Effect of ration on the nutritive quality of rumen microbial protein. , 1968 .

[23]  W. Horwitz Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[24]  T. Klopfenstein,et al.  Effect of corn processing on starch digestion and bacterial crude protein flow in finishing cattle. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[25]  R. Zinn,et al.  Influence of tempering on the feeding value of rolled corn in finishing diets for feedlot cattle. , 1998, Journal of animal science.