Automated Breast Ultrasonography (ABUS) in the Screening and Diagnostic Setting: Indications and Practical Use.

Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) is a new imaging technology for automatic breast scanning through ultrasound. It was first developed to overcome the limitation of operator dependency and lack of standardization and reproducibility of handheld ultrasound. ABUS provides a three-dimensional representation of breast tissue and allows images reformatting in three planes, and the generated coronal plane has been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy. This technique has been first used in the screening setting to improve breast cancer detection, especially in mammographically dense breasts. In recent years, numerous studies also evaluated its use in the diagnostic setting: they showed its suitability for breast cancer staging, evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and second-look ultrasound after magnetic resonance imaging. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current body of literature about the clinical performance of ABUS, summarize available evidence, and identify gaps in knowledge for future research.

[1]  Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features , 2014, Breast Cancer.

[2]  Paul L Carson,et al.  Automated Ultrasound Scanning on a Dual‐Modality Breast Imaging System , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  B. Kang,et al.  The image quality and lesion characterization of breast using automated whole-breast ultrasound: A comparison with handheld ultrasound. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Automated whole breast ultrasound. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  Jeon-Hor Chen,et al.  Computer-Aided Tumor Detection Based on Multi-Scale Blob Detection Algorithm in Automated Breast Ultrasound Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Qing Dai,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[8]  N. Papantoniou,et al.  The Contribution of Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Tumors: A Preliminary Report , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology international.

[9]  Qing Lu,et al.  Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[10]  E. Arleo,et al.  Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience. , 2014, Clinical imaging.

[11]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[12]  Yi Wang,et al.  Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[14]  Oguzhan Alagoz,et al.  Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental Ultrasonography Screening for Women With Dense Breasts , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  T. Sellers,et al.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  C. Balu-Maestro,et al.  Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value: report of 102 cases. , 2000, Clinical imaging.

[17]  Per Skaane,et al.  Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study , 2015, Acta radiologica.

[18]  Donghoon Yu,et al.  Automated Detection Algorithm of Breast Masses in Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Images , 2016, Healthcare informatics research.

[19]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[20]  Karen Drukker,et al.  Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[21]  Yuntao Xie,et al.  Early prediction of pathological outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using automated breast ultrasound , 2016, Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu.

[22]  Bing Hu,et al.  Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions , 2015, European Radiology.

[23]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Cancer in Automated 3-D Breast Ultrasound , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  N. Boyd,et al.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  K. Leifland,et al.  Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Bernard Rosner,et al.  Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[28]  M. Golatta,et al.  Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography , 2015, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[29]  Jeon-Hor Chen,et al.  Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound. , 2010, Medical physics.

[30]  Gel Pad Application for Automated Breast Sonography , 2015, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[31]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. , 2006, Radiology.

[32]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Multiplanar Reconstructions of 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound Improve Lesion Differentiation by Radiologists. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[33]  Qing Dai,et al.  Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[34]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations , 2015, Acta radiologica.

[35]  Young-Wook Choi,et al.  Computer-aided detection system for masses in automated whole breast ultrasonography: development and evaluation of the effectiveness , 2014, Ultrasonography.

[36]  B. Kang,et al.  Prospective Study Comparing Two Second‐Look Ultrasound Techniques , 2016, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[37]  W. Berg Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[38]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images. , 2007, Medical physics.

[39]  Phoebe E. Freer,et al.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[40]  Peter Hillemanns,et al.  Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) , 2013, BMC Medical Imaging.

[41]  L. Tabár,et al.  Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[42]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography , 2010, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[43]  Hee Jung Shin,et al.  Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  Soo Young Chung,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US. , 2006, Radiology.

[45]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Detectability of breast lesions under the nipple using an automated breast volume scanner: comparison with handheld ultrasonography , 2011, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[46]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  Automated quality assessment in three-dimensional breast ultrasound images , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[47]  Qingli Zhu,et al.  Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  Graham A Colditz,et al.  Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  L. Tabár,et al.  Effect of Baseline Breast Density on Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage, Mortality, and Screening Parameters: 25-Year Follow-up of a Swedish Mammographic Screening , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[50]  Xi Lin,et al.  Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[51]  U. Bick,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[52]  P. Baltzer,et al.  Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Radiology.

[53]  M. Golatta,et al.  Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[54]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[55]  V. Giuliano,et al.  Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[56]  M Reiser,et al.  Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[57]  Markus Hahn,et al.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[58]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[59]  Jiawei Sun,et al.  Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging. , 2016, Breast.

[60]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[61]  M. Giger,et al.  Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[62]  Zhiyuan Wang,et al.  The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[63]  Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[64]  Hee Jung Shin,et al.  Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[65]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications , 2017, La radiologia medica.

[66]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Rapid Breast Density Analysis of Partial Volumes of Automated Breast Ultrasound Images , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging.

[67]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[68]  Yuqi Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging on an Automated Breast Volume Scanning System , 2017, Ultrasonic imaging.

[69]  R Janka,et al.  Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. , 2008, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[70]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Improved cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound by radiologists using Computer Aided Detection. , 2017, European Journal of Radiology.

[71]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging , 2017, European Radiology.

[72]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. , 2011, Medical physics.

[73]  Wenping Wang,et al.  Imaging features of automated breast volume scanner: Correlation with molecular subtypes of breast cancer. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[74]  K. Kelly,et al.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts , 2009, European Radiology.

[75]  S. Wojcinski,et al.  The Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS): initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases , 2011, International journal of women's health.

[76]  Jun-Tao Jiang,et al.  Correlation between three-dimensional ultrasound features and pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2014, European Radiology.

[77]  Jae Jung Choi,et al.  Radiologists' Performance for Detecting Lesions and the Interobserver Variability of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[78]  Jie Tang,et al.  Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography , 2012, La radiologia medica.

[79]  Chris L de Korte,et al.  Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[80]  Karen Drukker,et al.  Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts. , 2013, Medical physics.

[81]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast cancers using Haar-like features in automated 3D breast ultrasound. , 2015, Medical physics.

[82]  H. Kim,et al.  Comparison of Lesion Detection in the Transverse and Coronal Views on Automated Breast Sonography , 2015, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[83]  Oliver D Kripfgans,et al.  Automated Breast Ultrasound: Dual-Sided Compared with Single-Sided Imaging. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.