CULTURAL RESOURCES AND SCHOOL SUCCESS: GENDER, ETHNICITY, AND POVERTY GROUPS WITHIN AN URBAN SCHOOL DISTRICT*

This paper tests a cultural resources/social interaction model of gatekeeping by school teachers using data for seventhand eighth-grade students in a city school district. Where previous investigations of "cultural capital" have focused on the rewards accruing to highbrow music and arts activities, we examine the informal academic standards by which teachers reward more general skills, habits, and styles. The result is a recursive causal model including the following blocks of variables: (a) student and teacher background characteristics, (b) student basic skills, absenteeism, and teacher judgments of student work habits, disruptiveness, and appearance; (c) coursework mastery; and (d) course grades. This model fits the data quite well, and almost completely accounts for the course-grade differentials observed for gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups. The most important predictor variable is the teacher's judgment of student work habits, followed by cognitive performance on both basic skills and coursework mastery. The results suggest that the standard (Wisconsin) status attainment model be modified to include culturallsocial-interactional-based measures of individual and gatekeeper behaviors and perceptions.

[1]  T. Williams Teacher prophecies and the inheritance of inequality. , 1976 .

[2]  D. Entwisle,et al.  School Performance, Status Relations, and the Structure of Sentiment: Bringing the Teacher Back In. , 1987 .

[3]  D. Entwisle,et al.  Early Schooling: Cognitive and Affective Outcomes , 1982 .

[4]  Jeffrey Leiter,et al.  Determinants of Elementary School Grading. , 1985 .

[5]  R. Hauser,et al.  The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis , 1975 .

[6]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[7]  Paul DiMaggio Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status-culture participation on the grades of U.S. high-school students , 1982 .

[8]  S. Shapiro The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  W. Wilson The Truly Disadvantaged , 1987 .

[10]  J. Ward,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America. Educational Reform and the Con tradictions of Economic Life. By Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books, Inc., 1976 , 1976 .

[11]  S. Dornbusch,et al.  Bringing Behavior Back In: The Effects of Student Characteristics and Behavior on the Classroom Behavior of Teachers , 1983 .

[12]  Ray C. Rist,et al.  The urban school: a factory for failure , 1973 .

[13]  J. Dusek,et al.  Do Teachers Bias Children’s Learning? , 1975 .

[14]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Pygmalion in the classroom , 1968 .

[15]  Ann Swidler CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[16]  T. Jamison D. Berry A. King,et al.  Education and income , 1959 .

[17]  M. Lamont,et al.  CULTURAL CAPITAL: ALLUSIONS, GAPS AND GLISSANDOS IN RECENT THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS* , 1988 .

[18]  H. Gintis,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America , 1976 .

[19]  R. Collins,et al.  Summer learning and the effects of schooling , 1978 .