Method for Improving Psychophysical Threshold Estimates by Detecting Sustained Inattention

Psychophysical procedures are applied in various fields to assess sensory thresholds. During experiments, sampled psychometric functions are usually assumed to be stationary. However, perception can be altered, for example by loss of attention to the presentation of stimuli, leading to biased data which results in poor threshold estimates. The few existing approaches attempting to identify non-stationarities either detect only whether there was a change in perception, or are not suitable for experiments with a relatively small number of trials (e.g., < 300). We present a method to detect inattention periods on a trial-by-trial basis to improve threshold estimates in psychophysical experiments using the adaptive sampling procedure Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). The performance of the algorithm was evaluated in computer simulations modeling inattention, and tested in a behavioral experiment on proprioceptive difference threshold assessment in 20 stroke patients, a population where attention deficits are likely to be present. Simulations showed that estimation errors could be reduced by up to 77% for inattentive subjects, even in sequences with less than 100 trials. In the behavioral data, inattention was detected in 14% of assessments, and applying the proposed algorithm resulted in reduced test-retest variability in 73% of these corrected assessments pairs. The algorithm complements existing approaches and can be adapted to sampling procedures other than PEST. Besides being applicable post-hoc, it could also be used online to prevent collection of biased data. This could have important implications in assessment practice by shortening experiments and improving estimates.

[1]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  H Strasburger,et al.  Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Karen A. Wilson,et al.  Attention during Lectures: Beyond Ten Minutes , 2007 .

[4]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Rapid, Adaptive Robotic Assessment of the MCP Joint Angle Difference Threshold , 2014, EuroHaptics.

[5]  M. Carrasco Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[6]  M. Leek Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  B. Treutwein Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  J. L. Hall Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  K. Kamibayashi Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 6th Edition , 2019, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[11]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Design of a robotic device for assessment and rehabilitation of hand sensory function , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[12]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Post-stroke rehabilitation: Assessment, referral, and patient management: Quick reference guide for clinicians , 1996 .

[13]  J. L. Hall,et al.  A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholds. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H J Meeuwsen,et al.  On the Psycho Physics of Arm-Positioning Movements , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[17]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Yi Shen,et al.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Jürgen Konczak,et al.  Assessing Proprioceptive Function: Evaluating Joint Position Matching Methods Against Psychophysical Thresholds , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[20]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M Fisher,et al.  Medical therapy for ischemic stroke. , 1996, Clinical neuropharmacology.

[22]  J. Maunsell,et al.  When Attention Wanders: How Uncontrolled Fluctuations in Attention Affect Performance , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[24]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[25]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  O. Parsons,et al.  Continuous reaction time in brain damage. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[28]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  Donna Fry-Welch,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Upper-Extremity Kinesthesis , 1996 .

[30]  M R Leek,et al.  An interleaved tracking procedure to monitor unstable psychometric functions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  P. Veltink,et al.  Observation of time-dependent psychophysical functions and accounting for threshold drifts , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[33]  Virginia M. Richards,et al.  Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics , 1989 .

[34]  Julien Bogousslavsky,et al.  Fatigue after Stroke: A Major but Neglected Issue , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[35]  H. Strasburger,et al.  Fitting the psychometric function , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  N. Prins The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less). , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  C. Kaernbach Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  P.EWEN KING-SMITH,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(96)00310-0 , 1997 .

[39]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[40]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Discrimination and identification of finger joint-angle position using active motion , 2007, TAP.

[41]  Peter Beike,et al.  Teaching Today A Practical Guide , 2016 .

[42]  C S Watson,et al.  Time course of auditory perceptual learning. , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[43]  D. Bligh What's the Use of Lectures? , 1971 .

[44]  J. Konczak,et al.  Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  A. V. Zomeren,et al.  Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[46]  M. M. Taylor On the efficiency of psychophysical measurement. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  G. Mead,et al.  Frequency and natural history of fatigue after stroke: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. , 2012, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[48]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research , 1973 .

[49]  Marleen H De Groot,et al.  Fatigue associated with stroke and other neurologic conditions: Implications for stroke rehabilitation. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  Pankaj Sharma,et al.  Triple dissociation of attention networks in stroke according to lesion location , 2013, Neurology.

[51]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[52]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[53]  D M Green,et al.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Brian Hodges PhD Md Frcpc Richard A practical guide for medical teachers , 2017 .