Inverse Stochastic Resonance in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells

Purkinje neurons play an important role in cerebellar computation since their axons are the only projection from the cerebellar cortex to deeper cerebellar structures. They have complex internal dynamics, which allow them to fire spontaneously, display bistability, and also to be involved in network phenomena such as high frequency oscillations and travelling waves. Purkinje cells exhibit type II excitability, which can be revealed by a discontinuity in their f-I curves. We show that this excitability mechanism allows Purkinje cells to be efficiently inhibited by noise of a particular variance, a phenomenon known as inverse stochastic resonance (ISR). While ISR has been described in theoretical models of single neurons, here we provide the first experimental evidence for this effect. We find that an adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model fitted to the basic Purkinje cell characteristics using a modified dynamic IV method displays ISR and bistability between the resting state and a repetitive activity limit cycle. ISR allows the Purkinje cell to operate in different functional regimes: the all-or-none toggle or the linear filter mode, depending on the variance of the synaptic input. We propose that synaptic noise allows Purkinje cells to quickly switch between these functional regimes. Using mutual information analysis, we demonstrate that ISR can lead to a locally optimal information transfer between the input and output spike train of the Purkinje cell. These results provide the first experimental evidence for ISR and suggest a functional role for ISR in cerebellar information processing.

[1]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Dynamic I-V curves are reliable predictors of naturalistic pyramidal-neuron voltage traces. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Neuronal Morphology Generates High-Frequency Firing Resonance , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Koch,et al.  Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks , 1998 .

[4]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of in vitro Purkinje cell somata in mammalian cerebellar slices. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A. Hudspeth Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Mario Dipoppa,et al.  Flexible frequency control of cortical oscillations enables computations required for working memory , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Nathan W. Gouwens,et al.  The Contribution of Resurgent Sodium Current to High-Frequency Firing in Purkinje Neurons: An Experimental and Modeling Study , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Idan Segev,et al.  The information efficacy of a synapse , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Matthias Durr,et al.  Methods In Neuronal Modeling From Ions To Networks , 2016 .

[10]  David Paydarfar,et al.  Noisy inputs and the induction of on-off switching behavior in a neuronal pacemaker. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  F. Jülicher,et al.  Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Yosef Yarom,et al.  Corticotropin-releasing factor increases Purkinje neuron excitability by modulating sodium, potassium, and Ih currents. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  I. Raman,et al.  Resurgent Sodium Current and Action Potential Formation in Dissociated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Memory trace and timing mechanism localized to cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Häusser,et al.  Reading out a spatiotemporal population code by imaging neighbouring parallel fibre axons in vivo , 2015, Nature Communications.

[16]  Michele Giugliano,et al.  On the Firing Rate Dependency of the Phase Response Curve of Rat Purkinje Neurons In Vitro , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Jonathan Touboul,et al.  Dynamics and bifurcations of the adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Bradley Greger,et al.  Purkinje cell spike firing in the posterolateral cerebellum: correlation with visual stimulus, oculomotor response, and error feedback. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations , 1989 .

[20]  M. Yartsev,et al.  Pausing Purkinje Cells in the Cerebellum of the Awake Cat , 2008, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[21]  Daqing Guo,et al.  Inhibition of rhythmic spiking by colored noise in neural systems , 2011, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[22]  Hermann Cuntz,et al.  A New Approach for Determining Phase Response Curves Reveals that Purkinje Cells Can Act as Perfect Integrators , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  T. Ebner,et al.  Single trial coupling of Purkinje cell activity to speed and error signals during circular manual tracking , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Kamran Khodakhah,et al.  The Linear Computational Algorithm of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Storage of Correlated Patterns in Standard and Bistable Purkinje Cell Models , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  H. Robinson,et al.  Threshold firing frequency-current relationships of neurons in rat somatosensory cortex: type 1 and type 2 dynamics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Bistability of cerebellar Purkinje cells modulated by sensory stimulation , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Regular Patterns in Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Trains , 2007, PloS one.

[29]  Zhanmin Lin,et al.  Differential Purkinje cell simple spike activity and pausing behavior related to cerebellar modules. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Weak Noise in Neurons May Powerfully Inhibit the Generation of Repetitive Spiking but Not Its Propagation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  S. Lisberger,et al.  The Cerebellum: A Neuronal Learning Machine? , 1996, Science.

[32]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[34]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Purkinje cells in awake behaving animals operate at the upstate membrane potential , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model as an effective description of neuronal activity. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Alain Marty,et al.  Interneurons of the cerebellar cortex toggle Purkinje cells between up and down states , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Random perturbations of spiking activity in a pair of coupled neurons , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[38]  P. Dean,et al.  The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Yosef Yarom,et al.  Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience Cellular Neuroscience Review Article Purkinje Cell Bi-stability , 2022 .

[40]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Inhibition of rhythmic neural spiking by noise: the occurrence of a minimum in activity with increasing noise , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[41]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Cholinergic Neuromodulation Changes Phase Response Curve Shape and Type in Cortical Pyramidal Neurons , 2008, PloS one.

[42]  John Porrill,et al.  Evaluating the adaptive‐filter model of the cerebellum , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Chris I De Zeeuw,et al.  Regional functionality of the cerebellum , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  J. Bower,et al.  An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. I. Simulation of current clamps in slice. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Membrane potential bistability is controlled by the hyperpolarization‐activated current IH in rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons in vitro , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  Jürgen Jost,et al.  Inhibition and modulation of rhythmic neuronal spiking by noise. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Evidence of a Hopf bifurcation in frog hair cells. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[48]  D. Hansel,et al.  How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Chizhov Av A model for evoked activity of hippocampal neuronal population , 2002 .

[50]  M. J Penner,et al.  Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited , 1997, Hearing Research.

[51]  Johannes J. Letzkus,et al.  Dendritic patch-clamp recording , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[52]  Takahiro Takano,et al.  Bergmann glia modulate cerebellar Purkinje cell bistability via Ca2+-dependent K+ uptake , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  M. Häusser,et al.  Tonic Synaptic Inhibition Modulates Neuronal Output Pattern and Spatiotemporal Synaptic Integration , 1997, Neuron.

[54]  Ray W Turner,et al.  Firing dynamics of cerebellar purkinje cells. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of in vitro Purkinje cell dendrites in mammalian cerebellar slices. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  M. Häusser,et al.  Compartmental models of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells based on simultaneous somatic and dendritic patch‐clamp recordings , 2001, The Journal of physiology.