The Effect of CArm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives. To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Design. Single-center, randomized, prospective study. Setting. Academic Level I trauma hospital. Patients and Intervention. 34 patients treated with cephalomedullary nailing for a stable, intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture (OTA A1). Main Outcome Measurement. The total working time of the fluoroscopy device, the dose-area product (DAP), operating time, reduction quality (cortical continuity, symmetrical collodiaphyseal angle, and shortness), and fixation quality (Bosworth quadrants, the tip-apex distance, TAD). Results. There were no cases of poor reduction; also the placement of the blade was optimal for 14 patients and suboptimal in 3 patients in each group. Superior-posterior placement of the blade or TAD > 25mm was not seen in any patient. Total operating time was significantly shorter when using device A compared to the use of device B (20.1 ± 3.4mins versus 25.3 ± 5.4mins, p < 0.001). Total radiation time was significantly shorter with device A compared to the use of device B (58.1 ± 19.4 secs versus 98.9 ± 55.4 secs, p = 0.008). The measured radiation dose was lower with the use of device A compared to device B (3.5 ± 1.2Gy⋅cm versus 7.3 ± 4.5Gy⋅cm, p = 0.002). Conclusion. Physical properties of fluoroscopy devices used during the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures could yield significant differences in operating times and the radiation dose while having comparable clinical results.

[1]  Beth A Schueler,et al.  How Does Patient Radiation Exposure Compare With Low-dose O-arm Versus Fluoroscopy for Pedicle Screw Placement in Idiopathic Scoliosis? , 2017, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  Hong-Man Cho,et al.  Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Treatment for Type A1 Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture in Elderly Patients: Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation , 2016, Hip & pelvis.

[3]  M. A. Aksekili,et al.  Traction table versus manual traction in the intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized trial. , 2016, Injury.

[4]  Utku Kandemir,et al.  Reduction of Radiation Exposure From C-Arm Fluoroscopy During Orthopaedic Trauma Operations With Introduction of Real-Time Dosimetry , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[5]  R. Anakwe,et al.  Defining reference levels for intra-operative radiation exposure in orthopaedic trauma: A retrospective multicentre study. , 2015, Injury.

[6]  S. Dalgleish,et al.  Peri-operative radiation exposure: Are overweight patients at increased risks? , 2015, Injury.

[7]  S. Zehir,et al.  Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different intramedullary nailing devices in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. , 2015, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[8]  Hae-Kag Lee,et al.  Analysis of radiation risk to patients from intra-operative use of the mobile X-ray system (C-arm) , 2015, Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

[9]  M. D. Baratz,et al.  The primary determinants of radiation use during fixation of proximal femur fractures. , 2014, Injury.

[10]  M. Nyska,et al.  Closed reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fractures is safer and more efficient using two fluoroscopes simultaneously. , 2014, Injury.

[11]  V. Kish,et al.  Laser Targeting With C-Arm Fluoroscopy: Effect on Image Acquisition and Radiation Exposure , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  S. Zhang,et al.  InterTan nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[13]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Intertrochanteric fractures: comparison between two different locking nails , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[14]  M. Fazal,et al.  Risk of ionising radiation to trainee orthopaedic surgeons. , 2012, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[15]  N. Bronsard,et al.  Can fluoroscopy radiation exposure be measured in minimally invasive trauma surgery? , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[16]  Jonathan N Grauer,et al.  Radiation exposure issues in orthopaedics. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Kaczynski,et al.  A comparative study of radiation dose and screening time between mini C-arm and standard fluoroscopy in elective foot and ankle surgery. , 2011, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[18]  D. Geng,et al.  Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail. , 2010, Injury.

[19]  J. Zou,et al.  A Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw Devices in Trochanteric Fractures , 2009, The Journal of international medical research.

[20]  Glenn R Rechtine,et al.  Patient and surgeon radiation exposure: comparison of standard and mini-C-arm fluoroscopy. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  R. Bansal,et al.  A Comparison of Radiation Exposure with the Conventional versus Mini C Arm in Orthopedic Extremity Surgery , 2008, Foot & ankle international.

[22]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system - report of early results. , 2008, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases.

[23]  Felix Matthews,et al.  Navigating the fluoroscope's C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow. , 2007 .

[24]  Giuseppe Mastrangelo,et al.  Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[25]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  S. Madan,et al.  Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb. , 2002, Injury.

[27]  A. Rogers,et al.  Dose-area product measurements in a range of common orthopaedic procedures and their possible use in establishing local diagnostic reference levels. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  J. McGuigan,et al.  Ionising radiation during internal fixation of extracapsular neck of femur fractures. , 1998, Injury.

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. , 1959, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.