Persistently exciting model predictive control

SUMMARY Model predictive control (MPC) is a well-known and widely used advanced control technique, which is model-based and capable of handling both input and state/output constraints via receding horizon optimization methods. Fundamentally, MPC is a nondynamic or memoryless state feedback control. Because of its use of a model, MPC should be amenable to adaptive implementation and to on-line tuning of the model. Such an approach requires guaranteeing signal properties, known as ‘persistent excitation’, to ensure uniform identifiability of the model, often expressed in terms of spectral content or ‘sufficient richness’ of a periodic input. We propose an approach to augment the input constraint set of MPC to provide this guarantee. This, in turn, requires equipping the controller with its own state to capture the control signal history. The feasibility of periodic signals for this condition is established. A computational example is presented illustrating the technique and its properties. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Fuzhen Zhang The Schur complement and its applications , 2005 .

[2]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Input conditions for continuous-time adaptive system problems , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Heinz Unbehauen,et al.  Adaptive Dual Control , 2004 .

[4]  Michael Athans,et al.  Analytical verification of undesirable properties of direct model reference adaptive control algorithms , 1981, 1981 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[5]  M. Athans,et al.  Convergence studies of adaptive control algorithms part I: Analysis , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[6]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Challenges of adaptive control-past, permanent and future , 2008, Annu. Rev. Control..

[7]  L. Valavani,et al.  Robustness of adaptive control algorithms in the presence of unmodeled dynamics , 1982, 1982 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  H. Genceli,et al.  New approach to constrained predictive control with simultaneous model identification , 1996 .

[9]  Karl Johan Åström Analysis of Rohrs counterexamples to adaptive control , 1983 .

[10]  Petar V. Kokotovic,et al.  Instability analysis and improvement of robustness of adaptive control , 1984, Autom..

[11]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Adaptive systems, lack of persistency of excitation and bursting phenomena , 1985, Autom..

[12]  C. Richard Johnson,et al.  Exponential convergence of adaptive identification and control algorithms , 1981, Autom..

[13]  O. A. Sotomayor,et al.  Closed-loop model re-identification of processes under MPC with zone control , 2009 .

[14]  E. Bai,et al.  Persistency of excitation, sufficient richness and parameter convergence in discrete time adaptive control☆ , 1985 .

[15]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control:Challenges and Opportunities , 2000 .

[16]  John B. Moore,et al.  Persistence of Excitation in Linear Systems , 1985, 1985 American Control Conference.

[17]  William A. Sethares,et al.  Parameter drift instability in adaptive systems , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Iven Mareels,et al.  Sufficiency of excitation , 1984 .