Three-dimensional ultrasound study of carotid arteries before and after endarterectomy; analysis of stenotic lesions and surgical impact on the vessel.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It has been proved that symptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis benefit from endarterectomy. Currently used methods for quantitation of the severity of carotid stenosis have limitations, and the impact of endarterectomy on the operated region of carotid artery remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of a 3-D ultrasound system for quantitation of stenotic lesions and to evaluate changes in regional vessel volume and cross-sectional area after carotid endarterectomy. METHODS We studied 14 patients with both carotid angiography and 3-D ultrasound. Of 13 patients who underwent surgery, 12 were reexamined with 3-D ultrasound after surgery. The length and volume of 20 randomly selected plaques were measured from 3-D data sets. The severity of stenosis was quantified by 3-D ultrasound using both a diameter method and an area method on cross-sectional views at the most stenotic site; the results were then compared with those from carotid angiography. The segmental vessel volume and average cross-sectional area of the operated artery both before and after endarterectomy were measured from 3-D ultrasound data. RESULTS Good correlation was obtained between 3-D ultrasound and carotid angiography in quantitative analysis of carotid stenosis (SEE=12.4%, r=0.76, and mean difference=7.0+/-12.3% with the diameter method; SEE=10.5%, r=0.82, and mean difference=1.8+/-10.5% with the area method by 3-D ultrasound). 3-D ultrasound had excellent reproducibility and small intraobserver and interobserver variability in plaque length and volume measurements. No significant changes in segmental vessel volume and average cross-sectional area of the operated artery were observed after surgery in patients with suture closure. However, a significant increase in segmental vessel volume was obtained in patients with polyfluorethylene patches applied to the surgical opening of the artery. CONCLUSIONS 3-D ultrasound can be used for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of plaques in the carotid artery and to detect and quantify significant carotid stenosis. Its volumetric potential has important clinical implications in serial follow-up studies for observing the progression or regression of stenotic lesions and for evaluating the outcome of interventional procedures such as endarterectomy or stent placement.

[1]  S. Atlas,et al.  Blinded‐Reader Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Ultrasonography for Carotid Artery Bifurcation Stenosis , 1994, Stroke.

[2]  T. Jensen,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group , 1991 .

[3]  R. Grimley,et al.  Accuracy of duplex versus angiography in patients undergoing carotid surgery. , 1995, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[4]  G. Wesbey,et al.  Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W. Mali,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography for carotid imaging , 1992, The Lancet.

[6]  J. Slattery,et al.  Prognostic Value and Reproducibility of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[7]  D. Downey,et al.  Three-dimensional sonographic reconstruction: techniques and diagnostic applications. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  G. Sicard MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis: European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43 , 1992 .

[10]  G. Hankey,et al.  Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. , 1990, Stroke.

[11]  J. Jaffe,et al.  3‐dimensional sonographic analysis based on color flow Doppler and gray scale image data: a preliminary report , 1992, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  R. F. Smith,et al.  Further Comments on the Measurement of Carotid Stenosis From Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[13]  J. Norris,et al.  Complications of carotid angiography. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  V. Hachinski,et al.  Angiographic Detection of Carotid Plaque Ulceration: Comparison With Surgical Observations in a Multicenter Study , 1994, Stroke.

[15]  K Rosenfield,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of human carotid arteries from images obtained during noninvasive B-mode ultrasound examination. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  M. Lindh,et al.  Accuracy of duplex sonography before carotid endarterectomy--a comparison with angiography. , 1996, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  C. Polman,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy: how does it work? A clinical and angiographic evaluation. , 1986, Stroke.

[18]  J. Eidt,et al.  Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  J. Slattery,et al.  Equivalence of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[20]  J. Thompson,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy. , 1993, Advances in surgery.

[21]  J. Valk,et al.  MATTERS ARISING , 1991 .

[22]  D. Dawson,et al.  The role of duplex scanning and arteriography before carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  S. Davis,et al.  Microemboli during carotid angiography. Association with stroke risk factors or subsequent magnetic resonance imaging changes? , 1996, Stroke.

[24]  R Mezrich,et al.  The comparative evaluation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance for carotid artery disease. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  R. Cartier,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. The reliability of Doppler ultrasonography and duplex scanning in preoperative assessment. , 1993, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[26]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[27]  M A Williams,et al.  Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid. , 1987, European journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Carotid artery imaging with computed tomography angiography. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[29]  K. Pojunas,et al.  Are both color-flow duplex scanning and cerebral arteriography required prior to carotid endarterectomy? , 1993, Annals of vascular surgery.

[30]  A. Valentin,et al.  Initial Experience With Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging During Carotid Endarterectomy , 1994, Stroke.