Decoder for Switching State-Space Models with Spike-Field Observations

The dynamics of brain activity are inherently non-stationary and can change depending on context, for example based on the tasks performed, the stimuli received, or the attention focus maintained. Thus to decode brain states in naturalistic scenarios, it is necessary to track such changes. Further, it is becoming increasingly common to measure the brain at multiple spatiotemporal scales by recording both spike and field activities simultaneously. Thus tracking non-stationarity necessitates efficient decoders that can detect changes in spike-field neural dynamics and accurately estimate the underlying neural and behavioral states. Here, we develop a new decoding framework to address this challenge. We build a multiscale switching dynamical model that assumes the underlying hidden neural state can evolve with dynamics chosen from an arbitrary finite set. The choice of dynamics could for example be dictated by a higher-level cognitive state such as attention level, which we call a switch state. This switch state would also dictate how the neural state is represented in the recorded binary spike events and continuous field signals, which may also have different time-scales. We use a mix of point process and linear Gaussian process models to characterize the spike-field observations. We derive a new multiscale decoder that simultaneously estimates the underlying neural and switch states from these spike-field observations. We show with closed-loop simulations that our new decoder is able to accurately estimate the switch state while accurately decoding the neural and behavioral states. We also show that not accounting for potential switches in dynamics leads to poor decoding. This new decoder has the potential to enhance future neurotechnologies.

[1]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Rapid control and feedback rates enhance neuroprosthetic control , 2017, Nature Communications.

[2]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Multiscale modeling and decoding algorithms for spike-field activity , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  A High-Performance Neural Prosthesis Enabled by Control Algorithm Design , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Maryam M. Shanechi,et al.  Brain–Machine Interface Control Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Michael J. Black,et al.  A switching Kalman filter model for the motor cortical coding of hand motion , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[7]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[9]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Robust Brain-Machine Interface Design Using Optimal Feedback Control Modeling and Adaptive Point Process Filtering , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  G. A. Ackerson,et al.  On state estimation in switching environments , 1968 .

[12]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Mixture of Trajectory Models for Neural Decoding of Goal-directed Movements a Computational Model of Craving and Obsession Decoding Visual Inputs from Multiple Neurons in the Human Temporal Lobe Encoding Contribution of Individual Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Velocity and Acceleration , 2008 .