Reconstructing the functional connectivity of multiple spike trains using Hawkes models

BACKGROUND Statistical models that predict neuron spike occurrence from the earlier spiking activity of the whole recorded network are promising tools to reconstruct functional connectivity graphs. Some of the previously used methods are in the general statistical framework of the multivariate Hawkes processes. However, they usually require a huge amount of data, some prior knowledge about the recorded network, and/or may produce an increasing number of spikes along time during simulation. NEW METHOD Here, we present a method, based on least-square estimators and LASSO penalty criteria, for a particular class of Hawkes processes that can be used for simulation. RESULTS Testing our method on small networks modeled with Leaky Integrate and Fire demonstrated that it efficiently detects both excitatory and inhibitory connections. The few errors that occasionally occur with complex networks including common inputs, weak and chained connections, can be discarded based on objective criteria. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS With respect to other existing methods, the present one allows to reconstruct functional connectivity of small networks without prior knowledge of their properties or architecture, using an experimentally realistic amount of data. CONCLUSIONS The present method is robust, stable, and can be used on a personal computer as a routine procedure to infer connectivity graphs and generate simulation models from simultaneous spike train recordings.

[1]  Antoine Chaffiol,et al.  Automatic spike train analysis and report generation. An implementation with R, R2HTML and STAR , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Vincent Rivoirard,et al.  Inference of functional connectivity in Neurosciences via Hawkes processes , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[3]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Recurrent interactions in spiking networks with arbitrary topology. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  A. Hawkes,et al.  A cluster process representation of a self-exciting process , 1974, Journal of Applied Probability.

[5]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[6]  G. Buzsáki Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  H. L. Bryant,et al.  Identification of synaptic interactions , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Lasso and probabilistic inequalities for multivariate point processes , 2015, 1208.0570.

[9]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[10]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Ole Winther,et al.  Multivariate Hawkes process models of the occurrence of regulatory elements , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  M. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity , 2005, Neural Computation.

[13]  Yasser Roudi,et al.  Multi-neuronal activity and functional connectivity in cell assemblies , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Roman Borisyuk,et al.  Statistical technique for analysing functional connectivity of multiple spike trains , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  D. Brillinger The Identification of Point Process Systems , 1975 .

[16]  E. Bacry,et al.  Estimation of slowly decreasing Hawkes kernels: application to high-frequency order book dynamics , 2016 .

[17]  E. S. Chornoboy,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Ralf D. Wimmer,et al.  Thalamic amplification of cortical connectivity sustains attentional control , 2017, Nature.

[19]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  D. Perkel,et al.  Simultaneously Recorded Trains of Action Potentials: Analysis and Functional Interpretation , 1969, Science.

[21]  A. Hawkes Point Spectra of Some Mutually Exciting Point Processes , 1971 .

[22]  E. Bacry,et al.  Estimation of slowly decreasing Hawkes kernels: Application to high frequency order book modelling , 2014, 1412.7096.

[23]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Correlation-based Analysis and Generation of Multiple Spike Trains Using Hawkes Models with an Exogenous Input , 2022 .

[24]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Inferring functional connections between neurons , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  D. Contreras,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of whisker-evoked responses reveals broad, sharply tuned thalamocortical input to layer 4 of barrel cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Reynaud-Bouret,et al.  Adaptive estimation for Hawkes processes; application to genome analysis , 2009, 0903.2919.

[27]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  The NEURON Book: Epilogue , 2006 .

[28]  Wen-Rong Wu Maximum likelihood identification of glint noise , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[29]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  The NEURON Simulation Environment , 1997, Neural Computation.

[30]  P. Brémaud,et al.  STABILITY OF NONLINEAR HAWKES PROCESSES , 1996 .

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.