Physics-Based Modeling and MPC for the Air Path of a Two-Stage Turbocharged SI Engine with Low Pressure EGR

For increasing the efficiency and simultaneously decreasing pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines, innovative air path concepts such as turbocharged gasoline engines with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) are in the focus of current research. These air and EGR path concepts impose high demands on the process control due to the nonlinearities and cross-couplings. This contribution presents a physics-based modeling approach and a nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) for the air path control of a sequentially two-stage turbocharged gasoline engine with low pressure EGR. By using EGR at high loads, the in-cylinder temperature can be lowered, reducing the knock probability, while at the same time preventing the need for enrichment of the air/fuel ratio. As air and EGR path are cross-coupled and show different delay times, a model predictive control (MPC) concept is proposed. Therefore, the air and EGR path are modeled in a physical manner, where possible.The model set up is based on a small amount of dyno-run measurement data acquired with a test vehicle. The model is built up such that it can be used within a MPC algorithm.The proposed control concept consists of an extended Kalman Filter for state and disturbance estimation and a NMPC controller considering the dynamic behavior of the air and EGR path. Subsequently, the nonlinear control concept for the two-stage turbocharged spark-ignited (SI) engine with Low Pressure EGR is implemented on a rapid control prototyping hardware, validated via simulative tests and compared to a linear MPC.

[1]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems , 2004 .

[2]  Philipp Adomeit,et al.  Zweistufige Turboaufladung — Konzept für Hochaufgeladene Ottomotoren , 2010 .

[3]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Nonlinear offset-free model predictive control , 2012, Autom..

[4]  P. Moulin,et al.  Modelling and control of the air system of a turbocharged gasoline engine , 2008 .

[5]  Sebastian Ewert,et al.  Potenziale der Abgasrückführung beim Ottomotor , 2014 .

[6]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  In-Vehicle Realization of Nonlinear MPC for Gasoline Two-Stage Turbocharging Airpath Control , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control , 2018, Mathematical Programming Computation.

[8]  Philippe Moulin,et al.  Control Design for a Second Order Dynamic System : Two-Stage Turbocharger , 2013 .

[9]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  Model predictive control of turbocharged gasoline engines for mass production , 2018 .

[10]  Christian Kirches,et al.  qpOASES: a parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming , 2014, Mathematical Programming Computation.

[11]  Stefan Pischinger,et al.  Two-Stage Turbocharged Gasoline Engines: Experimental Validation of Model-based Control , 2015 .

[12]  Philippe Moulin,et al.  Control of a two stage turbocharger on a Diesel engine , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[13]  H. Bock,et al.  A Multiple Shooting Algorithm for Direct Solution of Optimal Control Problems , 1984 .

[14]  MORITZ DIEHL,et al.  A Real-Time Iteration Scheme for Nonlinear Optimization in Optimal Feedback Control , 2005, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[15]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Modelling and Control of Engine Torque for Short-Circuit Flow and EGR Evacuation , 2017 .

[16]  Philippe Moulin AIR SYSTEMS MODELING AND CONTROL FOR TURBOCHARGED ENGINES , 2010 .

[17]  Matthias Mrosek,et al.  Model-based control of a turbocharged diesel engine with high- and low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation , 2017 .

[18]  Bilin Aksun Güvenç,et al.  Explicit MIMO Model Predictive Boost Pressure Control of a Two-Stage Turbocharged Diesel Engine , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.