Interacting with piles of artifacts on digital tables

Designers and architects regularly use piles to organise visual artifacts. Recent efforts have now made it possible for users to create piles in digital systems as well. However, there is still little understanding of how users shouldinteract with digital piles. In this paper we investigate this issue. We first identify three tasks that must be supported by a digitalpile—navigation, reorganisation and repositioning. We then present three interaction techniques—called HoverDeck, DragDeck and ExpandPile that meet these requirements. The techniques allow users to easily browse the piles, and also allow them to move elements between and within piles in an ad-hoc manner. In a user study that compared the different interaction techniques, we found that ExpandPile was significantly faster than the other techniques over all tasks. There were differences, however, in individual tasks. We discuss the benefits and limitations of the different techniques and identify several situations where each of them could prove useful.

[1]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What architects see in their sketches: implications for design tools , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[2]  E. Bono.  Lateral thinking: Creativity Step by Step , 1970 .

[3]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones , 2003, UIST '03.

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The Effects of Dynamic Transparency on Targeting Performance , 2003, Graphics Interface.

[5]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Pressure widgets , 2004, CHI.

[6]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The usability of transparent overview layers , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[8]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails , 2006, CHI.

[9]  Ianus Keller,et al.  Cabinet: merging designers’ digital and physical collections of visual materials , 2005, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Zliding: fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation , 2005, UIST.

[11]  Alison Kidd,et al.  The marks are on the knowledge worker , 1994, CHI '94.

[12]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  An experimental evaluation of transparent user interface tools and information content , 1995, UIST '95.

[13]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Experiences in Visual Thinking , 1972 .

[14]  Olha Bondarenko,et al.  Documents at Hand: Learning from Paper to Improve Digital Technologies , 2005, CHI.

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Supporting the creation of mood boards: industrial design in mixed reality , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[18]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[19]  Future Systems,et al.  For Inspiration ONLY , 1996 .

[20]  STEVE WHITTAKER,et al.  The character, value, and management of personal paper archives , 2001, TCHI.

[21]  Richard Mander,et al.  A “pile” metaphor for supporting casual organization of information , 1992, CHI.

[22]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Interacting with hidden content using content-aware free-space transparency , 2004, UIST '04.

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation , 2000, TCHI.

[24]  Deana McDonagh-Philp,et al.  Problem Interpretation and Resolution via Visual Stimuli: The Use of ‘Mood Boards’ in Design Education , 2001 .

[25]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  A computer support tool for the early stages of architectural design , 2006, Interact. Comput..