Logarithmic laws in service quality perception: where microeconomics meets psychophysics and quality of experience

Utility functions, describing the value of a good or a resource from an end user’s point of view, are widely used as an important ingredient for all sorts of microeconomic models. In the context of resource allocation in communication networks, a logarithmic version of utility usually serves as the standard example due to its simplicity and mathematical tractability. In this paper we argue that indeed there are much more (and better) reasons to consider logarithmic utilities as really paradigmatic, at least when it comes to characterizing user experience with specific telecommunication services. We justify this claim with the help of recent results from Quality of Experience (QoE) research, and demonstrate that, especially for Voice-over-IP and mobile broadband scenarios, there is increasing evidence that user experience and satisfaction follows logarithmic laws. Finally, we go even one step further and put these results into the broader context of the Weber-Fechner Law, a key principle in psychophysics describing the general relationship between the magnitude of a physical stimulus and its perceived intensity within the human sensory system.

[1]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[2]  METHODS FOR SUBJECTIVE DETERMINATION OF TRANSMISSION QUALITY Summary , 2022 .

[3]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Testing the IQX Hypothesis for Exponential Interdependency between QoS and QoE of Voice Codecs iLBC and G.711 , 2008 .

[4]  Yezekael Hayel,et al.  Modelling and analysis of Internet Pricing : introduction and challenges , 2005 .

[5]  Peter Reichl,et al.  The Logarithmic Nature of QoE and the Role of the Weber-Fechner Law in QoE Assessment , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  18th ITC Specialist Seminar on Quality of Experience , 2008 .

[7]  Joachim Fabini,et al.  A Stimulus-Response Mechanism for Charging Enhanced Quality-of-User Experience in Next Generation All-IP Networks , 2006 .

[8]  Fabio Ricciato Traffic monitoring and analysis for the optimization of a 3G network , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[9]  Gerardo Rubino From Quality of Service to Quality of Experience with PSQA , 2009 .

[10]  David Soldani,et al.  QoS and QoE Management in UMTS Cellular Systems: Soldani/QoS and QoE Management in UMTS Cellular Systems , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Reichl,et al.  How to Enhance Service Selection in Distributed Systems , 1996 .

[12]  Pierre Tirilly,et al.  Evaluating Users' Satisfaction in Packet Networks Using Random Neural Networks , 2006, ICANN.

[14]  Ernst Heinrich Weber,et al.  De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae , 1834 .

[15]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Quantification of Quality of Experience for Edge-Based Applications , 2007, ITC.

[16]  Martín Varela Rico Évaluation pseudo-subjective de la qualité d'un flux multimédia et ses applications au contrôle , 2005 .

[17]  Luis Bellido,et al.  Adaptive multimedia streaming over IP based on customer oriented metrics , 2006, 2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks.

[18]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  09192 Executive Summary - From Quality of Service to Quality of Experience , 2009, From Quality of Service to Quality of Experience.

[19]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service , 2010, IEEE Network.

[21]  Kalevi Kilkki,et al.  Quality of Experience in Communications Ecosystem , 2008, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Quality of Experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis , 2010 .

[23]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  The Network Utility Function : A practicable concept for assessing network impact on distributed services , 2005 .

[24]  Methods for objective and subjective assessment of quality Perceptual evaluation of speech quality ( PESQ ) : An objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs , 2002 .

[25]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Fairness and Stability of End-to-End Congestion Control , 2003, Eur. J. Control.

[26]  Ian Marsh,et al.  A systematic study of PESQ’s behavior(from a networking perspective) , 2006 .

[27]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Paris metro pricing for the internet , 1999, EC '99.

[28]  Y. Hayel,et al.  A New Way of Thinking Utility in Pricing Mechanisms : A Neural Network Approach , 2006 .

[29]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[30]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Perceived speech quality prediction for voice over IP-based networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[31]  Taiki Takahashi,et al.  Time-estimation error following Weber-Fechner law may explain subadditive time-discounting. , 2006, Medical hypotheses.

[32]  Bruno Tuffin,et al.  Charging the Internet Without Bandwidth Reservation: An Overview and Bibliography of Mathematical Approaches , 2003, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[33]  Eva Ibarrola,et al.  Web QoE Evaluation in Multi-agent Networks: Validation of ITU-T G.1030 , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems.

[34]  Peter Reichl,et al.  From charging for Quality of Service to charging for Quality of Experience , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.