A quantitative description of tetanic and post‐tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction.

1. End‐plate potential (e.p.p.s) were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca to study post‐tetanic potentiation (potentiation). 2. The magnitude of potentiation was not directly related to the number of conditioning impulses, but was a function of the frequency and duration of the conditioning stimulation. 3. Potentiation was always greater following an equal number of impulses delivered at a higher frequency of stimulation. 4. Plots of the magnitude of potentiation against the number of conditioning impulses would sometimes show an upward inflexion depending on the parameters of stimulation. 5. These experimental observations were described by a model based on the assumption (1) that potentiation is linearly related to a residual substance, R(t), which accumulates in the nerve terminal during repetitive stimulation, and (2) that each nerve impulse adds an identical increment, r, of this residual substance. The data were not described by assuming a 4th power relationship between potentiation and R(t). 6. The upward inflexion in potentiation (see paragraph 4) is described by the model as resulting from an increase in the time constant for the decay of potentiation as the magnitude of potentiation increases. 7. The increment of residual substance r added by each impulse was independent of the amount of transmitter released during the conditioning train. This increment typically increased transmitter release by amount 1% of the control level in the absence of potentiation. 8. Suggestions are given to explain why potentiation of transmitter release, which is thought to arise from an accumulation of Ca‐2+ in the nerve terminal, can be described assuming a linear relationship between potentiation and R(t), the proposed substance responsible for potentiation, under experimental conditions in which a 3rd to 4th power relationship would be expected to exist between external Ca concentration and evoked transmitter release.

[1]  D. Weinreich Ionic mechanism of post‐tetanic potentiation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. P. Quilliam,et al.  Some effects of preganglionic nerve stimulation on synaptic vesicle populations in the rat superior cervical ganglion , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  K L Magleby,et al.  The effect of repetitive stimulation on facilitation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  B. Katz,et al.  Further study of the role of calcium in synaptic transmission , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A Mallart,et al.  An analysis of facilitation of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Katz,et al.  The timing of calcium action during neuromuscular transmission , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Cooke,et al.  Cumulative and persistent effects of nerve terminal depolarization on transmitter release , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  E. Liberman,et al.  A study of the mechanism of quantal transmitter release at a chemical synapse , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  O. Hutter,et al.  Post‐tetanic restoration of neuromuscular transmission blocked by d‐tubocurarine , 1952, Journal of Physiology.

[10]  B. Katz,et al.  Spontaneous and evoked activity of motor nerve endings in calcium Ringer , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D. Jenkinson The nature of the antagonism between calcium and magnesium ions at the neuromuscular junction , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  R E Thies,et al.  NEUROMUSCULAR DEPRESSION AND THE APPARENT DEPLETION OF TRANSMITTER IN MAMMALIAN MUSCLE. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T. Maéno,et al.  Neuromuscular facilitation with low-frequency stimulation and effects of some drugs. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Hubbard,et al.  An investigation of the post‐tetanic potentiation of end‐plate potentials at a mammalian neuromuscular junction , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Miledi,et al.  Tetanic and post‐tetanic rise in frequency of miniature end‐plate potentials in low‐calcium solutions , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  K. Magleby The effect of tetanic and post‐tetanic potentiation on facilitation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. P. Quilliam,et al.  Local vesicle populations in rat superior cervical ganglia and the vesicle hypothesis , 1973, Journal of neurocytology.

[18]  D. Elmqvist,et al.  A quantitative study of end‐plate potentials in isolated human muscle. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Cooke,et al.  The role of calcium in depolarization—secretion coupling at the motor nerve terminal , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  A TAKEUCHI,et al.  The long-lasting depression in neuromuscular transmission of frog. , 1958, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Hubbard,et al.  The effect of temperature change upon transmitter release, facilitation and post‐tetanic potentiation , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  L. Tauc,et al.  Calcium influx in active Aplysia neurones detected by injected aequorin. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[23]  M. Cohen,et al.  The influence of internal sodium on the behaviour of motor nerve endings , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  A. Mauro,et al.  Effects of calcium and magnesium on the frequency of miniature end‐plate potentials during prolonged tetanization , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  A. W. Liley,et al.  An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  E M Landau,et al.  Post-tetanic potentiation and facilitation do not share a common calcium-dependent mechanism. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[27]  J. Rosenthal Post‐tetanic potentiation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  B. Katz,et al.  Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  J. Hubbard,et al.  On the mechanism by which calcium and magnesium affect the release of transmitter by nerve impulses , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  W. Gerrard Effect of Temperature , 1976 .

[31]  F. Dodge,et al.  Co‐operative action of calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  H. Atwood,et al.  Synaptic Facilitation: Long-Term Neuromuscular Facilitation in Crustaceans , 1971, Science.

[33]  K. Magleby,et al.  A dual effect of repetitive stimulation on post‐tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  T Maeno,et al.  Analysis of mobilization and demobilization processes in neuromuscular transmission in the frog. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.