Differentiation of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Single Brain Metastasis by Peak Height and Percentage of Signal Intensity Recovery Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and single brain metastasis (MET) are the 2 most common malignant brain tumors that can appear similar on anatomic imaging but require vastly different treatment strategy. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the peak height and the percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MR imaging could differentiate GBM and MET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with histopathologic diagnosis of GBM (n = 27) or MET (n = 16) underwent DSC perfusion MR imaging in addition to anatomic MR imaging before surgery. Regions of interest were drawn around the nonenhancing peritumoral T2 lesion (PTL) and the contrast-enhancing lesion (CEL). T2* signal intensity-time curves acquired during the first pass of gadolinium contrast material were converted to the changes in relaxation rate to yield T2* relaxivity (ΔR2*) curve. The peak height of maximal signal intensity drop and the percentage of signal intensity recovery at the end of first pass were measured for each voxel in the PTL and CEL regions of the tumor. RESULTS: The average peak height for the PTL was significantly higher (P = .04) in GBM than in MET. The average percentage of signal intensity recovery was significantly reduced in PTL (78.4% versus 82.8%; P = .02) and in CEL (62.5% versus 80.9%, P < .01) regions of MET compared with those regions in the GBM group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study show that the peak height and the percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from the ΔR2* curve of DSC perfusion MR imaging can differentiate GBM and MET.

[1]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  C. Studholme,et al.  Estimating Tissue Deformation between Functional Images Induced by Intracranial Electrode Implantation Using Anatomical MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[3]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  P. Wesseling,et al.  Angiogenesis in brain tumors; pathobiological and clinical aspects , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[5]  M Takahashi,et al.  Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Westphal,et al.  Treatment of malignant glioma: a problem beyond the margins of resection , 2001, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[7]  E. Shaw,et al.  Brain metastatic lesions. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  G Johnson,et al.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  B A Kall,et al.  Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  G. Johnson,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging: Correlation of signal intensity changes with cerebral blood volume measurements , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  W P Dillon,et al.  Correlation of microvascular permeability derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic grade and tumor labeling index: a study in human brain tumors. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[12]  David Schiff,et al.  Single brain metastasis , 2001, Current treatment options in neurology.

[13]  G. Criscuolo,et al.  Vascular permeability factor in brain metastases: correlation with vasogenic brain edema and tumor angiogenesis. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  W. Yuh,et al.  The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Michael H Lev,et al.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  A. Jackson,et al.  Simultaneous mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability surface area product in gliomas using iterative analysis of first-pass dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  K Sartor,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and contrast agent uptake in lesions with disrupted blood-brain-barrier. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  A. Rojiani,et al.  Glomeruloid vascular structures in glioblastoma multiforme: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  [Ultrastructure of capillary permeability in human brain tumor--Part 6: Metastatic brain tumor with brain edema]. , 1988, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[22]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Comparison of permeability in high-grade and low-grade brain tumors using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Descriptive epidemiology of primary brain and CNS tumors: results from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 1990-1994. , 1999, Neuro-oncology.

[25]  M. Berger,et al.  Centralized databases available for describing primary brain tumor incidence, survival, and treatment: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; and National Cancer Data Base. , 1999, Neuro-oncology.

[26]  D. Long,et al.  Capillary ultrastructure in human metastatic brain tumors. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.