Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer

An important aim of research on the blind image quality assessment (IQA) problem is to devise perceptual models that can predict the quality of distorted images with as little prior knowledge of the images or their distortions as possible. Current state-of-the-art “general purpose” no reference (NR) IQA algorithms require knowledge about anticipated distortions in the form of training examples and corresponding human opinion scores. However we have recently derived a blind IQA model that only makes use of measurable deviations from statistical regularities observed in natural images, without training on human-rated distorted images, and, indeed without any exposure to distorted images. Thus, it is “completely blind.” The new IQA model, which we call the Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) is based on the construction of a “quality aware” collection of statistical features based on a simple and successful space domain natural scene statistic (NSS) model. These features are derived from a corpus of natural, undistorted images. Experimental results show that the new index delivers performance comparable to top performing NR IQA models that require training on large databases of human opinions of distorted images. A software release is available at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/niqe_release.zip.

[1]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Statistics of natural image distortions , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment based on visual codebook , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence measurement , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[7]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Perceptual Video Processing: Seeing the Future , 2010, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[11]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[12]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment Without Human Training Using Latent Quality Factors , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Estimation of shape parameter for generalized Gaussian distributions in subband decompositions of video , 1995, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Yannick Berthoumieu,et al.  Multiscale skewed heavy tailed model for texture analysis , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[16]  D. Ruderman The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[17]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[18]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.