Causes of concentration/discharge hysteresis and its potential as a tool for analysis of episode hydrochemistry

Episodic variations in dissolved solutes are frequently complicated by a cyclical relationship between concentration and stream discharge. Established three-component models of runoff generation are used to explain this hysteresis effect and to illustrate how different component concentrations produce different hysteresis forms. It is demonstrated that a two-component model cannot reproduce all the hysteresis forms commonly observed. A method, based on the three-component system, is derived by which C/Q hysteresis can be used to predict relative component concentrations. This may provide a qualitative chemical description of sources supplying runoff for locations where these have not yet been directly established or a validation test where possible components have been sampled. The method has been tested using data collected at streams in the Adirondacks, New York, and the Northern Appalachian Plateau, Pennsylvania, during the Episodic Response Project of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Predicted component compositions were in good agreement with measurements made during other studies and with those subsequently obtained from one of the Pennsylvania watersheds.

[1]  G. E. Hendrickson,et al.  Geochemistry of natural waters of the Blue Grass region, Kentucky , 1964 .

[2]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Chemical fingerprints of hydrological compartments and flow paths at La Cuenca, Western Amazonia , 1995 .

[3]  R. Gillham.  The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table response , 1984 .

[4]  E. S. Corbett,et al.  Source Area Variability During Peakflow: A Function of Antecedent Soil Moisture Content , 1985 .

[5]  S. Schiff,et al.  Examining the contributions of glacial till water to storm runoff using two‐ and three‐component hydrograph separations , 1994 .

[6]  A. Jenkins,et al.  Analysis of storm hydrograph and flow pathways using a three-component hydrograph separation model , 1993 .

[7]  I. Morrison,et al.  Cycling of acid and base cations in deciduous stands of Huntington Forest, New York, and Turkey Lakes, Ontario , 1992 .

[8]  J. Drever,et al.  Water chemistry of a stream following a storm, Absaroka Mountains, Wyoming , 1977 .

[9]  P. J. Wigington,et al.  Use of factor analysis to investigate processes controlling the chemical composition of four streams in the Adirondack Mountains, New York , 1996 .

[10]  D. Raynal,et al.  Acid Precipitation and Ionic Movements in Adirondack Forest Soils1 , 1982 .

[11]  A. Hill.  Base cation chemistry of storm runoff in a forested headwater wetland , 1993 .

[12]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Soil solution chemistry of an Adirondack Spodosol: lysimetry and N dynamics , 1990 .

[13]  K. N. Eshleman,et al.  The role of soil water in stormflow generation in a forested headwater catchment: synthesis of natural tracer and hydrometric evidence , 1994 .

[14]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Mixing Model Approaches to Estimate Storm Flow Sources in an Overland Flow‐Dominated Tropical Rain Forest Catchment , 1995 .

[15]  J. Baker,et al.  Episodic Acidification of Small Streams in the Northeastern United States: Episodic Response Project , 1996 .

[16]  D. Walling,et al.  VARIATIONS IN THE NATURAL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION OF RIVER WATER DURING FLOOD FLOWS, AND THE LAG EFFECT: SOME FURTHER COMMENTS , 1975 .

[17]  R. D. Black,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils , 1970 .

[18]  R. Harriman,et al.  A case study in catchment hydrochemistry: conflicting interpretations from hydrological and chemical observations , 1994 .

[19]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Effect of Catchment‐Scale Subsurface Mixing on Stream Isotopic Response , 1991 .

[20]  H. W. Bond.  NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION PATTERNS IN A STREAM DRAINING A MONTANE ECOSYSTEM IN UTAH , 1979 .

[21]  A. S. Rogowski,et al.  Chemical‐hydrologic interactions in the near‐stream zone , 1988 .

[22]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Sources of acidic storm flow in an Appalachian Headwater Stream , 1989 .

[23]  R. J. Avanzino,et al.  Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, California , 1986 .

[24]  C. Cronan.  Biogeochemical influence of vegetation and soils in the ILWAS watersheds , 1985, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[25]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members ― an application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A. , 1990 .

[26]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Aluminum speciation and equilibria in soil solutions of a Haplorthod in the Adirondack Mountains (New York, U.S.A.) , 1984 .

[27]  F. A. Johnson,et al.  Cyclical relationships between river discharge and chemical concentration during flood events , 1982 .

[28]  John D. Hewlett,et al.  The Varying Source Area of Streamflow from Upland Basins , 1970 .

[29]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Biogeochemistry of two Appalachian deciduous forest sites in relation to episodic stream acidification , 1988, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[30]  G. Likens,et al.  The biogeochemistry of potassium at Hubbard Brook , 1994 .

[31]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment , 1988 .

[32]  Norman E. Peters,et al.  Variations in aqueous sulfate concentrations at Panola Mountain, Georgia , 1993 .

[33]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Streamflow generation on a small agricultural catchment during autumn recharge: II. Stormflow periods , 1994 .

[34]  M. Sklash,et al.  The Role Of Groundwater In Storm Runoff , 1979 .

[35]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: The use of principal components analysis for the end‐member mixing problem , 1992 .