Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David Green,et al. An Open Access Overview , 2012 .
[2] Claudio Gandelli,et al. Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[3] Natasha Gilbert,et al. Editor will quit over hoax paper , 2009 .
[4] Richard Van Noorden. Open access: The true cost of science publishing , 2013, Nature.
[5] Peter Suber. Open Access Overview , 2012 .
[6] M. Lauer,et al. Percentile Ranking and Citation Impact of a Large Cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Funded Cardiovascular R01 Grants , 2014, Circulation research.
[7] David W Grainger,et al. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[8] Jeffrey Beall,et al. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access , 2012, Nature.
[9] Christopher R. France,et al. Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers , 2011, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
[10] Peer‐Reviewed Publication: A View from Inside , 2004, Epilepsia.
[11] Elizabeth Wager,et al. Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective , 2006, International journal of clinical practice. Supplement.
[12] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[13] S. Sabharwal,et al. Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research , 2014, International Orthopaedics.
[14] David C. Prosser. Between a rock and a hard place: the big squeeze for small publishers , 2004, Learn. Publ..
[15] Jason Roberts,et al. An Author's Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals , 2009, Headache.
[16] G Bordage,et al. Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[17] Charlotte Haug,et al. The downside of open-access publishing. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[18] J F Waeckerle,et al. Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.
[19] B. Björk,et al. The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 , 2011, PloS one.
[20] B. Björk,et al. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact , 2012, BMC Medicine.
[21] Devi Lal,et al. The Rise of Open Access , 2011, Indian Journal of Microbiology.
[22] Jeffrey Beall,et al. Five Scholarly Open Access Publishers , 2012 .
[23] J. Bohannon. Who's afraid of peer review? , 2013, Science.
[24] Richard Van Noorden. Brazilian citation scheme outed , 2013, Nature.
[25] Elizabeth C. Whipple,et al. The Changing Landscape of Scholarly Publishing: Will Radiation Research Survive? , 2013, Radiation research.