Knowing whether or not a company is financial stable has always been a top concern for analysts and money managers. This paper compares the effectiveness of default prediction using two different types of measures: accounting and market based. Accounting measures have been the most popular even though, according to theory, a market based measure reflects all available information. Theory goes as far to say that accounting measures can add no incremental value to a market based measure. In my research I found that accounting based measures can be effective in their predictive power; the market-based measure (BSM) results were much more difficult to estimate within the limits of this research project.
[1]
F. Black,et al.
The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities
,
1973,
Journal of Political Economy.
[2]
Edward I. Altman,et al.
FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY
,
1968
.
[3]
Donald P. Cram,et al.
Assessing the Probability of Bankruptcy
,
2002
.
[4]
James A. Ohlson.
FINANCIAL RATIOS AND THE PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY
,
1980
.
[5]
R. C. Merton,et al.
On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates
,
1974,
World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.