Context-Preserving Visual Links

Evaluating, comparing, and interpreting related pieces of information are tasks that are commonly performed during visual data analysis and in many kinds of information-intensive work. Synchronized visual highlighting of related elements is a well-known technique used to assist this task. An alternative approach, which is more invasive but also more expressive is visual linking in which line connections are rendered between related elements. In this work, we present context-preserving visual links as a new method for generating visual links. The method specifically aims to fulfill the following two goals: first, visual links should minimize the occlusion of important information; second, links should visually stand out from surrounding information by minimizing visual interference. We employ an image-based analysis of visual saliency to determine the important regions in the original representation. A consequence of the image-based approach is that our technique is application-independent and can be employed in a large number of visual data analysis scenarios in which the underlying content cannot or should not be altered. We conducted a controlled experiment that indicates that users can find linked elements in complex visualizations more quickly and with greater subjective satisfaction than in complex visualizations in which plain highlighting is used. Context-preserving visual links were perceived as visually more attractive than traditional visual links that do not account for the context information.

[1]  Robert Kosara,et al.  Laws of Attraction: From Perceptual Forces to Conceptual Similarity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  VisLink: Revealing Relationships Amongst Visualizations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Multidimensional, Quantitative Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[5]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Directing attention and influencing memory with visual saliency modulation , 2011, CHI.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Interactively Exploring Hierarchical Clustering Results , 2003 .

[8]  Emden R. GansnerYifan Multilevel Agglomerative Edge Bundling for Visualizing Large Graphs , 2011 .

[9]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Graphical Means of Directing User's Attention in the Visual Interface , 1997, INTERACT.

[10]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Caleydo: Design and evaluation of a visual analysis framework for gene expression data in its biological context , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[11]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Interactive Visualization of Metabolic Pathways , 2007 .

[12]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[14]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Focus and Context in Mixed Reality by Modulating First Order Salient Features , 2010, Smart Graphics.

[15]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms , 1984, JACM.

[16]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces , 2009, CSUR.

[17]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  High Dimensional Brushing for Interactive Exploration of Multivariate Data , 1995, Proceedings Visualization '95.

[18]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Evaluating visual cues for window switching on large screens , 2008, CHI.

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[22]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Importance-driven compositing window management , 2011, CHI.

[23]  Danny Holten,et al.  Hierarchical Edge Bundles: Visualization of Adjacency Relations in Hierarchical Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays , 2005, CHI.

[25]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Semantic depth of field , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[26]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Visual links across applications , 2010, Graphics Interface.

[27]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Bubble Sets: Revealing Set Relations with Isocontours over Existing Visualizations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[28]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[29]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Force‐Directed Edge Bundling for Graph Visualization , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[31]  Richard May,et al.  A virtual environment for multimedia intelligence data analysis , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.